Alexander

Audience Reviews

View More (1000+)

Pedro Henrique C Alexander (2004) is a very long film, the story of the great Alexander was very little covered here, the cast tries to give the same energy as their characters but they don't get to the right point. Angelina Jolie's participation is very short. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 08/27/25 Full Review thiago s Filme fraco, o roteiro é fraco, as cenas são fracas, a história é fraca, o elenco é fraco, e ninguém ajuda a melhorar o filme, os personagens são fracos, e o filme deveria ter cenas bem melhores e relevantes, para fazer o filme ser bom Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 08/15/25 Full Review Carlos J I feel like the film would have been better with a better actor. Besides, we don't know much about Alexander the Great's story. The most we know are stories from friends or people who knew him. Carlos Jimenez Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 07/15/25 Full Review Stephen C 2 hours and 55 minutes is too long!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The USA grossed over $34,300,000.00!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 07/12/25 Full Review Audience Member Movie is way too long, but alright for one time watch... Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 07/08/25 Full Review Ola G "Alexander" (3 out of 5) Around 285 BC, Ptolemy I Soter, basileus and pharaoh of Ptolemaic Egypt, narrates the life of Alexander (Colin Farrell). Alexander grows up with his mother Olympias (Angelina Jolie) and his tutor Aristotle, where he finds interest in love, honor, music, exploration, poetry and military combat. His relationship with his father, Philip II of Macedon (Val Kilmer), is destroyed when Philip marries Attalus's niece, Eurydice. Alexander insults Philip after disowning Attalus as his kinsman, which results in Alexander's banishment from Philip's palace. After Philip is assassinated, Alexander becomes King of Macedonia. Ptolemy mentions Alexander's punitive campaign in which he razes Thebes, also referring to the later burning of Persepolis, then gives an overview of Alexander's west-Persian campaign, including his declaration as the son of Zeus by the Oracle of Amun at Siwa Oasis, his great battle against the Persian Emperor Darius III in the Battle of Gaugamela, and his eight-year campaign across Asia... Rotten Tomatoes critical consensus states: "Even at nearly three hours long, this ponderous, talky, and emotionally distant biopic fails to illuminate Alexander's life." One of the principal complaints among American film critics was that Alexander resembled less an action-drama film than a history documentary. Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times, giving the film two out of four stars, wrote in his review, "We welcome the scenes of battle, pomp and circumstance because at least for a time we are free of the endless narration of Ptolemy the historian." Faint praise came from Todd McCarthy of Variety who wrote, "Oliver Stone's Alexander is at best an honorable failure, an intelligent and ambitious picture that crucially lacks dramatic flair and emotional involvement. Dry and academic where Troy (2004) was vulgar and willfully ahistorical". (Via Wikipedia) This "epic" pompous historical drama film based on the life of the ancient Macedonian general and king Alexander the Great has the foundation of being a great "Sword-and-sandal" film like "Troy", but unfortunately it fails more or less on all levels. The acting and deliverance of the lines is over theatrical and it feels like the ensemble is reading from an ancient manuscript. The actors are over acting more or less throughout the film and you simply don't believe in any of the characters nor the historical drama it is supposed to be channeling. Colin Farrell is quite terrible as Alexander and I hate to say that as he is a magnificent actor. The accents are a massive problem in my book, most speak with an Irish accent and I can't understand how Oliver Stone thought that would fly, while some characters like Angelina Jolie´s Olympias speak with an English accent with some undertone of a foreign language. It becomes silly to be honest. The drama never really becomes a drama and the action sequences are few and not all that exciting. And it's just too much of a talky film we are served. Endless talking with endless mentions of names after names. And I don't get the switch to 8 years earlier in the second half of the film that makes no sense at that point during the running time. Maybe a desperate way of Stone recutting the film close to the premiere from what he thought was going to be the final running time, despite the fact that the initial theatrical cut was 175 minutes! "Alexander" is a snooze I am afraid to say. It just doesn't work. Trivia: The film's original screenplay was derived in part from the book Alexander the Great, published in 1973 by the University of Oxford historian Robin Lane Fox. After release, while it performed well in Europe, the American critical reaction was negative. It grossed $167 million worldwide against a $155 million budget, thus making it a commercial failure. (Via Wikipedia) Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 09/26/24 Full Review Read all reviews

Alexander

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now