(Pri)sons

Audience Reviews

View More (1)

Monsieur F This movie feels like an amateur project but with good production values (sets, costumes, weaponry, cameras, sound design). The actors look ok, but most of them can‘t act and/or the screenplay doesn‘t need them to act but just to look grim. The introduction of the characters is quite fast or non existent. They are there and they just do something or react to something. The characters are one dimensional and throughout the movie there is no real character development. For me as a viewer the characters weren’t interesting and that’s unfortunately a huge problem for the movie to keep my interest. The movie takes in the beginning some of my patience, but I‘m good spirited and hope it’s getting better: After nearly half time I was already maximum bored. So, if the acting, the characters and the plot don‘t get my interest, what about the action, blood and gore: The action is solid, sometimes gets into music clip aesthetics, but sometimes it‘s not that well choreographed or paced. And the female assassin gets two action scenes that nearly get into porn atmosphere than though action scenes. Were the movie has its merrits is in the blood and gore section. Nice practical effects and shootouts, exagerated gory and in this combination bad script/ bad acting but really good practical effects this movie reminds Olaf Ittenbach and his movies. All in all, this movie is related to movies like „Project Wolf Hunting“ (2022), no real interest in the characters or a good plot but in gory action and violence. Thin plot, bad acting, superficial characters, nice synth score, gory action, good sets, solid camera, some pacing issues and extremely boring. I think, with some buddies, more beer and just for the gore this movie might be entertaining. Else, just skip this one. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 09/06/25 Full Review Read all reviews

(Pri)sons

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now