The Dust of Time

Audience Reviews

View All (21) audience reviews

Audience Member when you love & admire a very unique way of intellectual storytelling combined with an inimitable visionary style plus transmitting metaphorically encoded historical &/or political messages or agendas, that will crucially influence the persons involved, then you have to be in great anticipation as soon as a new film by angelopoulos is announced. he certainly is in a league of his own when it comes to auteurist masterworks: the travelling players, Alexander the great, the hunters, voyage to kythera, landscape in the mist, are undoubtedly movies of unparalleled beauty & expressiveness. of course, you may criticize the one-sidedness of his recurring theme (greek history in the 20th century intervening & intertwining with the individual fates of angelopoulos' protagonists) or the lack of depth or even shallowness of his characters (they seem hollow because they usually represent archetypes & not persons per se), and an irritating tendency to allow his actors bursts into melodramatic gestures & exclamations: minor flaws you quickly forget, because you are drawn into a cinematic maelstrom you don't want to miss. angelopoulos' last achievement though, the dust of time, second film of the so called "trilogia" following the weeping meadow, is a major disappointment i am still recovering from (if you don't mind the hypochondriac touch of my saying so). i saw the movie at the film museum munich, shortly after it premiered in Germany at the berlinale 2009. since angelopoulos obviously denied permission for screening (the film museum hosted an angelopoulos-retrospective, having the dust of time making the final contribution) a projection of the DVD-version was shown instead, with the expected harrowing results. a double-no-go, the organizers at film museum are to blame for: you just don't show an angelopoulos-movie made in 35mm as a DVD beamed on the screen, it's like a diluted premier cru from château Margaux. but the lousy quality of the screening was matched by two hours of what I would mildly call a failed attempt by angelopoulos to make an angelopoulos-movie: it is pretentious & cliché-ridden, it tries to operate on multiple levels none of which has enough substance to either carry the storyline or to make us sympathize with its protagonists. while watching the movie one is constantly reminded that it just wants too much & achieves almost nothing. at least, you may admire the tremendous effort involved in orchestrating the mass-scenes, but you can't get rid of the feeling that this & some remarkably symbolic shots are not enough to rank this higher than average. besides, i haven't seen a movie in a long time that throws its actors' massive talents that easily overboard. of course, you may give it a try, it's an angelopoulos' film, but i do bid you welcome to the club of "the disappointed cineast". Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 02/02/23 Full Review Audience Member There is something very wrong with the movie info! :D Rated 4.5/5 Stars •  Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 02/15/23 Full Review Audience Member Guys of the Rotten tomatoes you have confused Angelopoulos' Dust of Time with Bitomsky's Dust--different films and different directors--please rectify Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 01/26/23 Full Review Audience Member My least favorite film by Angelopolous and yet there were some great things there; the great cinematography I came to except from this magnificent artist, a wonderful performance from Bruno Ganz and more surprisingly,from Irene Jacob, who proved she's not just an angelic pretty face; but the thing I liked the most was how he used a high-sensitivity film to make the grains appear like dust throughout the film. The weakest point for me was William Dafoe. Rated 4/5 Stars •  Rated 4 out of 5 stars 02/22/23 Full Review Audience Member demasiado artsy para miiii Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 01/16/23 Full Review Audience Member so poetic, beautiful... comfortable and can feel the tention breathtakingly beautiful....i saw twice in consecutive days Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 01/25/23 Full Review Read all reviews

The Dust of Time

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW