Kristin G
Hilarious and a source of content quotes. 80's funny and a top movie for me.
Rated 4.5/5 Stars •
Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars
05/28/23
Full Review
Steve D
Never funny and often uncomfortable.
Rated 0.5/5 Stars •
Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars
02/26/23
Full Review
Carlos I
It's got a great premise, with an amazing comedic cast, but it ultimately doesn't do anything very interesting with all these great elements. It's entertaining enough to pass the time with, but with these ingredients on hand, this should've been hilarious.
Rated 3/5 Stars •
Rated 3 out of 5 stars
11/22/22
Full Review
Audience Member
Well. Probably won't be watching this again anytime soon. It was funny and all, but kinda boring tbh. The most redeeming factor was Peter Boyle's Jesus complex, which used to have a great comedic effect throughout the film. Michael Keaton was alright, kinda boring too tho. Idk, it just didn't jibe with me yk? It is very well executed, just not a task/story I want to see done. An appreciable use of 2 hours of my time, but there are maaaaaany movies I would much rather watch than this. 63/100. Not bad. that about sums it up. Prolly won't watch again.
#29
Movie title and release year: The Dream Team (1989)
63/100, D-
Reviewer name and watch date: Andrew Thorpe, 5/3/2022, Tue.
1a - Attraction value - upon first contact, is the idea appealing?: 6/10
1b - Attraction value - cast, plot, series, other medium influence?: 6/10
2a - Acting - casting - lead, supporting, villain, etc: 10/15
2b - Acting - character interaction, emotional connection: 10/15
3a - Dialogue - use for moving plot forward, nuance: 6/10
3b - Dialogue - writing quality, profanity, comedy: 10/15
4a - Plot - logical within universe, easy to follow, makes sense: 10/15
4b - Plot - quality, is it a good plot? too long, unique?: 10/15
5a - Themes & motifs - symbolism, strong impressions: 5/15
5b - Themes & motifs - applicable ideas and thoughts, call to action: 2/5
6a - Cinematography - pace of editing, cuts, scene length, etc: 10/15
6b - Cinematography - angle, tone mood of shots: 9/15
7a - Effects - practical - explosions, large animals & vehicles: 4/5
7b - Effects - practical - costumes, weapons, props: 4/5
7c - Effects - practical - settings, scenery: 4/5
7d - Effects - special - CGI, green screen: 3/5
8a - Sound - score - conveying mood, determining attitude, etc: 15/20
8b - Sound - sound fx - foley, gunshots, explosions, dialogue sound quality: 5/10
9a - Direction - quality - vision, concept, should this movie exist?: 6/10
9b - Direction - choices - execution of vision, cohesiveness: 12/15
10 - Bonus - up to 30 bonus points: 10/30
Total out of 250: 157/250
letterboxd: @the_og_bigjoe
insta: @the_og_bigjoe
Rated 3/5 Stars •
Rated 3 out of 5 stars
02/12/23
Full Review
Audience Member
There were a lot of "the crazies have escaped" type films in the late 80s and early 90s but this one at least has a little more imagination and a good ensemble cast. Good pace, not too long. Worth a Saturday night.
Rated 3/5 Stars •
Rated 3 out of 5 stars
02/15/23
Full Review
Audience Member
Discussing the flaws in this otherwise enjoyable film is futile, as condemnation from the politically correct crowd drown out any legit criticism.
Rated 3/5 Stars •
Rated 3 out of 5 stars
02/25/23
Full Review
Read all reviews
Post a rating
>
