Sidewalks of New York

Audience Reviews

View More

thiago S @Thiagostone Mar 27 Filme fraco, o roteiro é fraco, as cenas são fracas, a história é fraca, o elenco é fraco, e ninguém ajuda a melhorar o filme, os personagens são fracos, e o filme deveria ter cenas bem melhores e relevantes, para fazer o filme ser bom See more Rare T @RT00283363 09/10/2024 A whole plot kept intact through just dialogue; that is difficult to achieve, even if Sidewalks of New York doesn’t necessarily excel to the point of climax. Speaking of climax, there definitely is some humor in delivering the bawdiness. Guilty pleasures are coined by movies like this one. See more Ola G @Ollie1972 06/10/2023 In New York there´s eight cycles in the lives of six Manhattan residents whose inter-connections form a circle that places each of them less than the proverbial six degrees of separation from the others. Rotten Tomatoes consensus reads: "Though well-acted, Sidewalks of New York generally comes off as a second-rate Woody Allen film. The characters seem self-absorbed, the problems trite." In his review in The New York Times, A.O. Scott said, "Though it fails to be very interesting, Sidewalks of New York, like the people who populate Mr. Burns's New York, is impossible to dislike. If it's not especially funny, it is appealingly good-humored, and the actors perform well within the limitations of the script ... [Burns] deserves credit for avoiding the sudsy happily-ever-after clichés that deform so many contemporary romantic comedies. The view of love that emerges from Sidewalks, while it is not particularly deep or insightful, is refreshingly hard-headed without being altogether cynical." Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times observed, "The movie lives at the intersection between Woody Allen and Sex and the City...[It] is funny without being hilarious, touching but not tearful, and articulate in the way that Burns is articulate, by nibbling earnestly around an idea as if afraid that the core has seeds." In Variety, Scott Foundas called the film "not just instantly forgettable, but beginning to fade from memory even as its images still play across the screen" and one "seized by fitful bouts of hilarity and charm," a picture whose "overall impression is one of overindulgence and underimagination - a sponge cake without the yeast." (via Wikipedia) With "Sidewalks of New York" we get a solid ensemble cast containing Edward Burns, Rosario Dawson, David Krumholtz, Brittany Murphy (RIP), Stanley Tucci, Heather Graham and Dennis Farina. We also get solid acting in a documentary style that works and which I do like, however there´s no real highs and no real lows in this film. "Sidewalks of New York" doesn´t really go that deep or have that many insights as Roger Ebert pointed out, but there´s still an entertainment value to my mind. However, I think it´s a bit too talky for my taste. See more Steve D @RT35616104 02/05/2023 Emotionally hollow, and with obnoxious characters. See more 01/07/2020 This movie absolutely turned out to be a great movie. My family and I loved it very much. The cast was absolutely phenomenal. The acting performances of Edward Burns, Brittany Murphy, Heather Graham, Stanley Tucci and Rosario Dawson were absolutely incredible. The storyline was awesome and the whole entire film was absolutely perfect. If you’re looking for a great art house/indie film, then this 2001 classic is a great gem for you guys to enjoy! See more 03/07/2018 Love edward burns as a actor but the movie was childishly whiny and annoying. Too many games played by actors and alot of whiny teenage behavior and contradictions. Edward burns character was The only good thing about the movie. See more Read all reviews

Sidewalks of New York

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING