1900

Audience Reviews

View All (388) audience reviews

Steve D Decent but far FAR too long. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 04/20/24 Full Review C 1900 (1976) was an excessively long, violent, and obscene movie. There was no drama or romance. It basically is a horror film guised as a historical drama. A lot of violence against women and animals. No heros, just thugs. Neither De Niro's nor Sutherland's best movie. A lot better historical drama to watch is Doctor Zhivago (1965). Seems like Hollywood was forgetting how to make a good movie, over a decade later. Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 09/21/23 Full Review Josh G A beautiful soundtrack set to the slowest moving story ever made, all the cast are amazing it's so so damn long, I watched in three segments, it struggles with the same flaws as south pacific not showing parts of the war. But ever shot is a masterpiece must taken forever to film. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 04/23/23 Full Review Emmanuel D Novenceto had everything to be one of the greatest movie of all time, unfortunately signore Bertolucci chose a quasi-documentary direction, which turned an epic romantic titan to a cold, cruel and melancholic colossus. Yet, the cast is amazing, the natural colors are beautiful, the story and the themes are fierce, the vilains are awfully great, and signore Morricone is at his best. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 03/10/23 Full Review s r 1001 movies to see before you die. A great cast squandered on a poor political drama and mediocre direction. It manages to take on Italian politics from 1900 to post WW2. The poor dialogue that didn't translate well was also undermined by the poor dubbing. It was tedious despite some good memorable scenes and contrived situations / cinematography. It was STG DVD. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review William L You can add all the acting talent, all the on-location shooting, all the bloated runtime, and all the full-frontal Robert De Niro nudity that you want to, that doesn't make a film an epic, or any good. 1900 is a grand production without any profound statement to make; massive scale, incredible production value, and grand ambition are wasted at the hands of a script that seems to avoid character depth like the plague (the conflicting personal features of De Niro's Alfredo, born wealthy and good-natured but unable to avoid the influence of his status, is the sole character with more than one actual dimension) and often features dialogue that makes you scratch your head. Depardieu's Olmo = unrelenting idealist hero, Sutherland's Attila = irredeemable Fascist monster, and Alfredo is intended to be left in between but any internal conflict is seldom explored. With a scale that could allow depth and passion, Bertloucci's film has the moral complexity of a Frank Capra film. While the end result's great strength is its on-location production, without which we wouldn't be able to witness such beautiful and diverse shooting locations, this is also the film's critical flaw, as the international production incorporating established American actors ends up becoming a film produced from the ground up without an original language. No matter what version you watch, there is always going to be some awkward dubbing, making many of the powerful moments seem paper-thin and the pandering moments feel satirical. The child actors are poor even by child actor standards, and while we do get a great (though brief) performance from Lancaster and a wide-ranging De Niro rather than the reserved, sullen archetype that he would come to embody, they are integrated so erratically as to feel wasted. We are left with a film that had the means but not the will to execute on a grand vision of political dynamics and personal change. Old Sterling Hayden sounds (and looks) an awful lot like J.K. Simmons. (2/5) Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 10/04/21 Full Review Read all reviews

1900

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now