Angels in the Endzone

Audience Reviews

View More (32)

r 9 Boring, mainly thanks to its copied main premise from the first film of this remake trilogy. 'Angels in the Endzone' is a lame watch. I do appreciate the switching up of the backstory for the sporting events, but even then they don't exactly create a fresh, new plotline or anything - it's hearty, but something we've all seen before. The simple change from baseball to American football isn't sufficient. The overall acting, though a big drop from the 1994 production, is actually pretty solid, even if none of the cast particularly stand tall in my memory. Christopher Lloyd is again underused, not that I blame him for not committing fully to this - the cheek to put him on the cover, by the way. Of the main, more used cast members, Paul Dooley is probably the standout. A disappointing sequel to 'Angels in the Outfield'. Here's hoping for an improvement from 'Angels in the Infield' - I'm an optimist! Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review steve d It can not capture a drop of the charm of the original. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 03/30/23 Full Review Audience Member A fun football movie. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 01/17/23 Full Review Audience Member this is an awesome flick. great for the kids and very emotional. it is a classic plain and simple Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 02/25/23 Full Review Audience Member c'est mon film préferer de david gallagher! Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 01/12/23 Full Review Audience Member It wasn't terrible, and it did have a lot of sad moments. Not a great movie, but could've been worse. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 02/08/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Angels in the Endzone

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW