Claire in Motion

Audience Reviews

View More (23)

Alain E In the first eight minutes we see a young boy who knits (very common in US-not!) and Claire’s husband who recently had an apparently serious dizzy spell, takes off on a survivalist hike that is supposed to last three, four days but he is considered lost the very next morning. Claire is supposedly a mathematician, but the story doesn’t compute. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 06/24/25 Full Review Linda T I liked Claire's persistence to search for her husband. There were lots of cues to a possible ending. I think he is alive but just wanted to live in the woods after all the clues getting stronger all the time. It didn't make sense the grad student, who seemed to want an affair with him , wasn't distraught he was missing but I could include that as a clue as to how it would end. I agree with the person who liked the police chief, very understanding and also Claire's neighbor was very real/understanding.. Rated 4/5 Stars •  Rated 4 out of 5 stars 04/15/25 Full Review Audience Member CLAIRE IN MOTION is well done, but the storyline goes nowhere, wanders and then the movie's over. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 05/14/24 Full Review Jennifer E Slow paced, with characters that are just boring. It's not wonder the guy disappeared. One look at the script and he noped right out of there. Just do yourself a favor and watch something else, even it's just drying paint. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 07/31/23 Full Review ronald h _Claire in Motion_ is a self-important, dreary film that strains under the weight of its own metaphors. It's 95 percent atmosphere and 5 percent plot. That might work in a movie in which we actually cared about the characters, but everybody here is so contrived and distant, there's nothing to latch on to emotionally. Claire is a math professor at a small Ohio college (It looks like it was filmed in and around Ohio University in Athens). Her husband Paul, also a professor, goes off on a routine hiking trip (He's an ornithologist) and simply vanishes. But the film isn't about some extensive police search or mystery; it's about Claire and her response to her husband's disappearance. To complicate things, she discovers that he had been spending a lot of time with an attractive grad student. It's not clear if the relationship was sexual, but it was intimate. The grad student knows things about Paul that Claire never knew. It might possibly make for interesting drama if the characters were not so damned unlikeable. Claire is solipsistic and uncommunicative, her prepubescent son is moody and depressive, the grad student is pretentious and obnoxious, and Paul is seen so little that we have no insight into him. I've never understood why filmmakers make movies in which we have no reason to care about the characters. If we can't sympathize or relate to them, who gives a damn what happens to them? The aforementioned metaphors are simplistic and glaring: birds, sky diving--symbols of escape and freedom. A high school student could have come up with this stuff. I watched it to the end, thinking that after wading through all the pretension, I would at least find out what happened to Paul. No big spoiler: It doesn't happen. Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 03/30/23 Full Review Audience Member Extremely slow character development leaves you feeling like the characters were never individually formed. The ending was vague and again never answered the questions raised during the film. If the final seconds were meant to be "artsy" it was done with crayons in an elementary school. Sad Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 02/18/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Claire in Motion

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now