Dead Men Walk

Audience Reviews

View More

Chris M @RT21954632 11/15/2022 This was the dumbest movie to ignore the rules of the vampire until "The Twilight Saga" becomes a thing. But as bad as this is it's still better than any "Twilight" movie. Like "The Mad Monster" things only happen for plot. Plus the evil and good twin was cliché even way back in 1943. Like a lot of bad movies if the runtime was long than a tad over an hour they would have time to explain things. But I guess budget or the studios made these short lengths. Which honestly ends up ruining what could have been classics. See more 02/02/2018 Above average script, editing, & special effects for a cheap B-movie. Brothers vying for supremacy makes for a nice variation of the vampire genre. Zucco is exceptional in the leading roles of this campy flick. See more 11/20/2017 Probably one of the lowest budget films you'll ever see that you'll totally love! See more 03/27/2013 Long... ennuyant... il se passe rien, on peut pas tellement appeler ça un film d'horreur non plus. See more andy f @RT81936104 12/30/2012 Pretty good 40s horror with masterful performances by the underrated George Zucco. Dwight Frye pops up in his usual role too. A reasonably straight vampire movie that starts better than it ends. See more 11/01/2012 A bromidic black and white vampire film in which George Zucco plays two different characters, twins in fact, and does a decent job. Adam Sandler should take notes. See more Read all reviews

Dead Men Walk

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING