Dead Men Walk

Audience Reviews

View More (19)

Chris M This was the dumbest movie to ignore the rules of the vampire until "The Twilight Saga" becomes a thing. But as bad as this is it's still better than any "Twilight" movie. Like "The Mad Monster" things only happen for plot. Plus the evil and good twin was cliché even way back in 1943. Like a lot of bad movies if the runtime was long than a tad over an hour they would have time to explain things. But I guess budget or the studios made these short lengths. Which honestly ends up ruining what could have been classics. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 11/15/22 Full Review Audience Member Above average script, editing, & special effects for a cheap B-movie. Brothers vying for supremacy makes for a nice variation of the vampire genre. Zucco is exceptional in the leading roles of this campy flick. Rated 4.5/5 Stars •  Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 01/25/23 Full Review Audience Member Probably one of the lowest budget films you'll ever see that you'll totally love! Rated 4/5 Stars •  Rated 4 out of 5 stars 02/13/23 Full Review Audience Member Long... ennuyant... il se passe rien, on peut pas tellement appeler ça un film d'horreur non plus. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 01/20/23 Full Review andy f Pretty good 40s horror with masterful performances by the underrated George Zucco. Dwight Frye pops up in his usual role too. A reasonably straight vampire movie that starts better than it ends. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 03/30/23 Full Review Audience Member A bromidic black and white vampire film in which George Zucco plays two different characters, twins in fact, and does a decent job. Adam Sandler should take notes. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 02/24/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Dead Men Walk

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now