Flaming Creatures

Audience Reviews

View All (22) audience reviews

Ruairi M Wrong film, I haven’t ever seen this one, apologies. Thought I was reviewing something else. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 09/30/24 Full Review Eitan D An "artistic" movie that is a jumble of uncoherent images that don't mean anything and don't evoke any special feelings Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 04/11/21 Full Review William L The best thing about arthouse cinema is that there are no rules. It's also the worst thing about arthouse cinema. Flaming Creatures is visually washed-out (to the degree that it's hard to even see what's going on) and strange, featuring a nonsensical storyline and a cast of characters of ambiguous gender that seems more intended to create shock value than anything else. Call me unsophisticated and a mindless consumer of popular big-studio film, but most of what this genre has to offer does nothing for me, particularly the New York experimental scene of the '60s; it's bizarre weirdness pretending to be something more substantial. The best thing about this film is that it's mercifully short and at least tries to do something different. (1/5) Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 03/27/21 Full Review s r 1001 movies to see before you die. This one shouldn't be on the list. It was Avant- garden ridiculousness. If you're really curious, the first 10 minutes will suffice before you turn it off. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review david f A very experimental film without story, characters, or plot. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review william k Both aesthetically appealing and provocatively appalling experimental short remains controversial to some, but also arguably is considered a classic in its own right. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Flaming Creatures

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW