Lovelace

Audience Reviews

View More (542)

Rich S Linda Lovelace deserved a better telling of her story. Despite an exceptional cast, it's no surprise about the path the film took considering one of the co-directors was named Epstein. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 02/28/25 Full Review Imthe W Vraiment moins mauvais que ce qu'on en a dit. Ce biopic démarre sur une version bien proprette et standard pour finalement bifurquer vers ce qui s'est vraiment passé . J'ai crains de revoir le meme film 2x parce que bon l'histoire premiere semblait bien crédible mais la Version de la victime l'est d'autant plus. Amanda Seyfried donne une performance tout a son honneur ainsi que l'enssemble du casting. Le plus important de tout: On ne s'ennuit et la fin du film on y réfléchie et on se pose des questions. Ce qui est toujours bon signe. Bien mieux que ce que j'attendais . Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 09/15/24 Full Review Lúcio Leonardo P At first it seemed to me like an empty film, wanting to show a porn fairy tale, with some gaps not filled, then, the story is being completed and there is nothing fairy tale about it. It can't be easy being a porn actor or actress, no matter how "hot" a night for two or even the solitude of a Friday night may be, the underground world of the porn industry is far from glamorous. And Linda Lovelace's trajectory could not be different. And whoever is thinking that there will be "putzzaria à la vontê", can take the horse out of the rain, as the entire plot is shown in a light way, but without losing the heavy tone that was Lovelace's life. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 09/05/24 Full Review Gareth v A solid biopic, that could of easily gone down the pornographic path given the subject matter but refrained. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 06/20/23 Full Review Daniel D This is not a terrible movie, but it's not a good one either. As others have observed, the script was so weak that the actors never had a chance to make it good. But they tried. Amanda Seyfried gave a damn fine performance -- such that the movie was bad in spite of her, not because of her. Still, she should be more selective about the scripts she chooses. This one was just uninspired and unoriginal. Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 04/08/22 Full Review dave s The first half of Lovelace plays itself out in a linear, paint-by-numbers manner as it details the life of Deep Throat actress Linda Lovelace (Amanda Seyfried) from the time she was living under the oppressive rule of her parents until the time she left home with adult entertainment hustler Chuck Traynor (Peter Sarsgaard). Just when it appears that the film is going to stick to the standard biopic formula, events start to pinball around in time, creating a confusion that was probably similar to Lovelace's turbulent life. While the whole thing is a bit of a mixed bag, it is ultimately saved by Seyfried's performance, a raw and gritty portrayal of a strangely iconic performer, a tragic figure whose life was, sadly, defined by a single performance. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 03/30/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Lovelace

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now