Audience Member
Meh, unmemorable and bland. The characters are plain, the scares are boring, and the plot is slow and dull. I wasn't really sure what was going on, and it seemed to just be scene after scene. I really couldn't care much for it.
Rated 2/5 Stars •
Rated 2 out of 5 stars
02/02/23
Full Review
Audience Member
Wages Of Sin is a campy horror film with religious themes thrown in. Even though this film is undeniably cheesy, I had a lot of fun watching it since I enjoyed the humor, the acting is corny in a good way, the story was intriguing, I liked the music, and I was rarely ever bored as I watched it unfold. It's low budget nonsense, but it's fun low budget nonsense if you're in the right mood for a campy horror film.
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
02/26/23
Full Review
Audience Member
A dull plot line with horribly bad acting and a borderline anti-religious tone. Long, boring shots don't boast any skills from the director. The music sounds like apple loops and the make up is awful. It takes over 40 minutes of dragging dullness to get to the "good" part.
Avoid this movie like the plague.
Rated 1.5/5 Stars •
Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars
02/25/23
Full Review
Audience Member
Why I even bothered with this puzzles me. This is like one of the worst horror movies out there, but I just love to hate it.
PLOT:Sue Walker (Ashlie Clark) inherits a house deep in the country which her family used to own. She has no memory of the place after the time she spent in therapy. So, to check out the house, she takes her boyfriend, Ron (Brandon Michael), and a couple other friends of hers for the weekend. However, this house seems to have a bad reputation in the town she's in. When they arrive at the old house, memories start slowly coming back to Sue about what happened there: memories of a mentally-disturbed priest she used to be related to. Strange things happen to accompany that and disturb her and her friends. It's a decent plot executed horribly.
ACTING:The performances in this movie suck pretty horribly. No one really did a good job, but Ashlie Clark and Brandon Michael did a nearly-decent job of Sue and Ron. The other two sucked, especially Prentice Reedy. He was the worst actor in the whole movie. Billy St. John tried to play a reasonable part as the evil priest, but it ended up falling flat after a while.
SCORE:The score was interesting. It was repetative, but it wasn't horrible and fit the mood half of the time.
EFFECTS:The effects in here were terrible. They would have been better off with a tube of fake blood and Halloween decorations, which they may have used anyway.
OTHER CONTENT:This movie I only watched because it was given to me in a 4-pack as a gift. I didn't like it at all. The execution is lame along with everything else and the ending is terrible, too. However, I love to hate it. I can sit back and laugh at all of the flaws and treat it more as a comedy instead of a horror. It's like a Troll 2 or Plan 9 type of movie, where it's loved to be hated. I laugh at it rather than get scared.
OVERALL,a horrible horror movie with a horribly executed plot, sucky performances, interesting score, terrible effects, lame execution, and a terrible ending, but I love to hate it so much that I laugh at it.
Rated 0.5/5 Stars •
Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars
01/21/23
Full Review
Audience Member
Very odd movie - but interesting at the same time.
Rated 2/5 Stars •
Rated 2 out of 5 stars
02/15/23
Full Review
Audience Member
This film looks horrible, the acting is terrible and the story doesn't bring anything new to the genre. If you haven't figured it out yet, I'll do you a favour... avoid this puppy if you can. It's not worth your time or your brain cells. Ok now that I've done you a favour, I'll let you know when you can return it. ;)
Rated 1/5 Stars •
Rated 1 out of 5 stars
01/28/23
Full Review
Read all reviews
>
