Warcraft

Audience Reviews

View More

nammaw 04/20/2023 I think it needed more action and no so boring but on the other hand there were people sitting behind us talking through the move the whole time. I couldn't hear the movie too well. See more jeremy f @FRITZ1 Dec 29 Whatever the reviews were for this in 2019 are so far wrong , this movie is a swing ! it shoot for the fel abyss and hits like a truck.. if you read this review i would head this warning. Most reviews made about this MOV was paid for and unjest... this movie is a solid 7.8. The acting suffers, but the fantasy and lore topples almost all movies.. It makes me so freaking mad this movie did not get more rec.. it got thrown out as trash but it's literally a GEM. I've watched this movie many times. always good. See more Mpire M @Mpire Dec 27 These North American scums just cost me an opportunity of seeing a sequel of one of the best movies I've ever seen. I just saw a review of someone saying she can't tell one orc from the other cos they all look the same and that's why she gave the movie a low rating...Are you kidding me!!!🤦🏾‍♂️ I hate each and everyone of you that gave Warcraft a low rating and I wish you guys were never born😫 See more JT J Nov 29 This movie has proven itself to be rewatchable and delivers on all the right levels. I only wish it would get a sequel. See more Wayne H Nov 8 Nobody knows what they are on about, if it was a movie about anime ladies in school uniforms they would be about it. Film was pretty good would say 5/10 only because i never played warcraft and half these nerds who reviewed it prolly did, and all of them use an avatar thats slim and in skimpy clothes while really they are sweating in their mums basement. Give it a chance, battle los angeles is worse See more Romas M @Romas Oct 24 Greetings from Lithuania. "Warcraft" (2016) is a one OK / nice movie to see it in a movie theater for those who didn't play the games and couldn't spell one of many bizarre names of characters in this movie (I'm one of those). Special effects were good, nothing groundbreaking, but good. The weakest part of this movie for me was Travis Fimmel acting. That has to be one of the most uninspiring performances (which should have been inspiring) in big budget movies ever - he just went trough all movie with one face expression - even when something very dramatic happened - he was just staring at the screen, with no emotions visible. They need to re- cast the main actor in a sequels, if there will be any. And sorry Paula Patton, almost every time you went on screen with that ultra-bizarre looking haircut and make-up, i started to smile. The story was quite OK - like i said i only played one of the very first games, so all the characters for me were unknown, and many of them remained unknown after the movie. As not a fan i can say, this movie won't be as much impressive to see it at home, so if you want to spend 2 hours and see some OK flick on Friday evening, "Warcraft" is for you, but don't expect to be blown away. Overall, "Warcraft" is nicely paced movie, which at running time 2 hours made me to watch at my watch only once - and it was in a scene were some mags were fighting. Performances were between low and OK - better cast highly recommended for sequels (although there was one very short cameo - i won't spoil anything, but this great actor / actress should have been more on screen - it's the biggest star of this movie for sure). "Warcraft" is a one nice flick to see it once on a big screen, and for home media - extended version is recommended (if there will be one), because the strange thing but this movie wasn't predictable overall, and there even were some glimpses for a great, epic movie, but on it's running time 2 hours the story didn't had enough room i guess. So - it's a OK flick for those who haven't play the games, and it wasn't as bad as critics said. See more Read all reviews

Warcraft

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now