Dracula

Audience Reviews

View All (1000+) audience reviews

Robert Very cool to see a classic film on the big screen, hopefully they do this all the time with movies I never got to see in theaters Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 10/15/23 Full Review Chris B Really good film .Classic movie and excellent move. Very well written. Acted and directed. Rated 4.5/5 Stars •  Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 03/09/25 Full Review Audience Member The first Hollywood Dracula movie that cemented the look of Dracula in the minds of the Public for the last century. The film follows the plot of the play it is based on much more than the novel. Dracula, Renfield, and Van Helsing are all played very well, but the film suffers a little from certain scenes being absent(whatever happened to Vampire Lucy?). Overall an enjoyable film and a must see for Dracula and film lovers. Rated 4/5 Stars •  Rated 4 out of 5 stars 01/25/25 Full Review Shawan S Dracula (1931) is a classic film that shows us horror can be more than just jump scares or special effects. It can be a gradual journey through a misty hallway filled with dramatic acting and tense, quiet moments. So invite a friend, make some popcorn, and get ready for a night where the real fright might be wondering why you like it so much! This movie is a timeless work of art that deserves applause—or at least a thoughtful acknowledgment. Cheers to classic films! Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 01/07/25 Full Review Audience Member Supero mis expectativas que eran negativas así que probablemente me gustó mucho más de lo que me hubiera gustado si hubiera tenido las expectativas como con todas las películas que veo. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 01/05/25 Full Review Omar G Dracula (1931). It was too silly, Renfield a fool before and after meeting Dracula. Edited to last 1:15 hr compared to the Spanish version that had more scenes like when they mention Lucy's death. Harker is so effeminate that he would be a cuckold. Mina is pretty but she is not so much with an odious personality. Lucy is less pretty, the girl who sold flowers was prettier, Lupita Tovar should have been Mina or Lucy. Here the death of Lucia the vampire was missing. The girls of the time were natural without rhinoplasty, implants, collagen in the lips, liposuction or botox. Dracula was stupid in both 1931 versions by Universal, Dracula should have killed Van Helsing. In these versions Harcker was very unmanly. Bram Stoker's Dracula Starring Bela Lugosi, this Comic is a better adaptation than the poorly adapted and poorly edited Dracula (1931) movie that lasts 1h 15 min from Universal, for example they don't show Lucy's death as a vampire, I insist. They have never made the greatest Dracula movie, they always stayed halfway, this Comic is better than those movies. Could the Universal executives use that Comic as a storyboard and make Bela Lugosi's face with cgi, to make a better movie. Or some fan make a fan movie with artificial intelligence when the technology is perfected and show it on YouTube. The best thing is the art drawing sexy women as Count Dracula's brides, when they try to seduce Jonathan Harker and above all the main point of this book which is to put Bela Lugosi's face on Dracula. The best thing about this movie would be the unconscious French maid on the floor and the madman approaches her, in the Spanish version he eats an insect. The most hateful was Van Helsing and Martin for being too clownish, although he says the best quote in the movie "everyone is crazy, except you and me and sometimes I have my doubts about you", the maid says "yes". Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 12/24/24 Full Review Read all reviews

Dracula

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now