1920: Horrors of the Heart

Audience Reviews

View All (8) audience reviews

HL I somewhat liked the storyline but the ending was repetitive and could’ve been better. The VFX was trash however not sure why! Aside from that it was good. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 06/29/23 Full Review sandya k The movie was so slow that it was more painful than scary. Every scene was stretched to the maximum. Storyline not terrible, direction and acting average and scary scenes were non-existent because the flow was so so slow! Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 07/18/24 Full Review ananya r This was one of the worst "horror" movies ever. I was not scared even for a second. Let's, for a second, assume that the movie makers did not intend for it to be a horror movie (which they totally did by the way). Even then, just on the basis of the story and the logic of the story, it is a terrible movie. This movie is an insult to the audience's intelligence. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 08/28/23 Full Review Invincible W Worst of the 1920 movie series. "1920 Horror of Heart" is a disappointing addition to the 1920 movie series. Despite the presence of senior actors who try their best to salvage the film, it's hard to ignore the glaring issues with the screenplay and the performances of the rest of the cast. The film's storyline fails to engage the audience, leaving them disconnected from the characters' plight. The attempts to induce fear often fall flat and, at times, unintentionally provoke laughter rather than genuine scares. It's unclear whether the lackluster experience is due to budget constraints or other factors, but one thing is certain – it's a regrettable waste of time. For those looking to enjoy the 1920 series, it's advisable to revisit the older installments, as "1920 Horror of Heart" doesn't do justice to the legacy of its predecessors. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 08/24/23 Full Review Someone U The story had slight potential. But the premise, the caricature haunting, the boring love story, the unrealistic characters and an amateurish direction is so annoying. The reason why a movie like Raaz or 1920 (first installment) worked is because the characters were relatable and regular people. The story was over the top not the characters. It's painful to see Bhatt family (Vikram and now the daughter) waste so much money on amateurish bullshit instead of working on their craft and learning from horror cinema around the world. What are these cringe dialogues? Who watches and approves them? Even people in tier 3 cities cringe out. Why can no one act? Well I guess that's because no sensible actor would even read these cringe scripts. And there is not an ounce of horror in this movie. Not even a decent jump scare. Just exorcist like scenes. Which btw worked for 1920 (first installment) because of the build up and that sense of loneliness. Again, this is childish direction and storytelling at best. If the director or scriptwriter is reading this, please go watch Aseq. It a low budget home film but my god is it scary or what! And go on Instagram and read the horror short stories on @sunnysideup_storys Any horror short story on that page is better than this horse shit Again, there is no w Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 06/28/23 Full Review Pranay K Peer pressure led me to watch this film, which had a totally non-sensical plot, extremely bad acting, and very poor VFX - but compared to Adipurush, which had 60 times its budget, it becomes baffling how much the team behind this film was able to pull off in the post-production process! Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 06/27/23 Full Review Read all reviews

1920: Horrors of the Heart

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW