Battle of the Worlds

Audience Reviews

View More (3)

Tamara K The only reason I discovered this was because I was looking for Claude Rains films. He is great as usual. The rest are so bad they are laughable. Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 08/01/25 Full Review Kurt F The only redeeming factor is the inimitable Claude Rains. Badly written script, stilted acting, ridiculous story, hodgepodge of misunderstood science. 1930s Buck Rogers made more sense. Almost acts as a pilot film for Doctor Who which first appeared a couple of years later. I made myself watch it and it was a chore. If you really must see it, it is on Youtube. With a different director, screenwriter, and cast around Rains it might have been comparable to some of the venerable 1950s SF masterpieces. This particular film is a 30-day wonder. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 05/21/25 Full Review Steve D Painful to see Rains reduced to this. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 01/25/24 Full Review Read all reviews

Battle of the Worlds

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now