Flight of Fury

Audience Reviews

View More (127)

Christopher J A Major improvement for Steven Seagal’s Direct to DVD movies it had a decent story and fairly good action and ok acting 8/10 Rated 4/5 Stars •  Rated 4 out of 5 stars 07/18/24 Full Review William D This is absolutely one of the worst films I have ever seen. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 11/27/23 Full Review Audience Member One of the worst movies ever. To say steven segal is acting is to missuse The word acting. He just walk around like he have taken to much valium. My plant have more expressions and acting better than segal. It should be illegal to take monney for watching this. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 02/10/23 Full Review Audience Member Wow, even as a waiting room flick for a tire change this sucked Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 02/04/23 Full Review camille l Flight of Fury est la troisième preuve que Michael Keusch est infoutu de réaliser des scènes d'action efficaces. Cependant, force est de constater que c'est le moins nul de ses trois films avec Steven Seagal, plus léthargique que jamais ici, dans un rôle où il passe 30% du temps dans un avion à shooter des trucs imaginaires qui explosent dix fois chacun. Les acteurs sont nuls, le scénario est aberrant, le rythme est anémique et la musique générique. Pas très bon, en fin de compte... Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review Audience Member College level film with a small budget Flight of Fury surely has to be the worst film to include feature Steven Seagal. Even worse than ATTACK FORCE, M Keusch, the college level director helps completely destroy whatever the script and actors could have brought to this poor film. There is an entertaining and unexpected scene in this film which helped relieve the tedium, and that is where 2 female soldiers have a short lesbian romp, out of the blue. At that point I thought the film might U-turn and transform into something entertaining and watchable, but of course, as soon as the breasts were covered again, mediocrity and poor lines continued to be poorly delivered. The action scenes are particularly awful, the camera shakes like a leaf in a force 10 gale, blurring the images to the point where you seriously wonder what the producers and director were thinking. They couldn't have done a worse job. Seagal to me was sidelined in the film, I was too distracted by how terrible the film was. Seagal didn't speak a lot and when he did it wasn't anything he hadn't said a million times before in every other film he's done. Usually he'll say something to the effect of "Yes", "No", "I'm going to go and kill the bad guys now". Any lines that he delivers that relate to the story are said with utter disregard, as if he just wants to skip the quiet scenes and start scrapping. 20 minutes toward the end of the film and I was having trouble keeping my eyes from closing, I wanted to instead switch it off, look at the wall for 10 minutes and forget all about this school project of a film. A nightmare. I could speak about other problems of the film, such as the terrible lighting, but just reference some of my previous Seagal films if you need any more detail about it. 0.5/5 - lowest rated film by Seagal so far. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 01/14/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Flight of Fury

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now