Lust for Dracula

Audience Reviews

View All (8) audience reviews

Audience Member Lots of female vampires rubbing and touching each other but still pretty boring. Misty Mundae's infantile performance is, um, interesting under the circumstances, and her story threads split between Julian Wells and Darian Caine might make this worthwhile for some. Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 02/23/23 Full Review Audience Member the title says it all, if you like vampires and blood,lust,this film is for you Rated 4.5/5 Stars •  Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 02/18/23 Full Review Audience Member Lots of flesh but otherwise boring Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 01/16/23 Full Review Audience Member A decadently seductive take on the classic tale, LUST FOR DRACULA uses an all-female cast to portray the main character, suggesting that not only men have base, animal desires. Veteran soft-core actress Misty Mundae plays Mina Harker, a young wife unhappy with her unattentive husband (Julian Wells). When the mysterious Count Dracula (Darian Caine) comes along, Mina finds it hard to resist. Meanwhile, her sister, Abigail Van Helsing (Shelly Jones) is lusting after Jonathan, longing to destroy everything Mina Has. An erotically charged film, little more than a softcore lesbian porn. Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 02/23/23 Full Review Audience Member Okay what the hell is this piece of shit, it's all over the place. The only good thing is the vampire fangs and the two main stars Misty and Darian. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 01/14/23 Full Review Audience Member A Misty Mundae movie by any other name will still suck as bad. Yes, the women are hot, but there are hot women in better movies, too. If Misty (or Erin, if she prefers) would just do more stuff like SICK GIRL, I'd be a lot happier. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 02/16/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Lust for Dracula

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW