No Man's Land: The Rise of Reeker

Audience Reviews

View More (147)

Justin T It looked fine visually. Not much to say really. There was nothing wrong with the picture. In fact it was unnoticeable so it must have been good. The picture didn't get in the way of the story. It wasn't too fast or too complex. It was just right. The surround sound element was a little dull but overall it was very serviceable. The effects and music were both unnoticeable which again means that it must have been good. It all suited the mood. I don't especially remember the first film but this sequel felt like the exact same movie all over again. About half-way through I worked out the ending (or remembered it from the first movie) and that did depreciate my enjoyment a little. There were a few funny bits, like the invisible wall; walking legs with no body; man with half a head, which took away from the tone of horror. The scares made me jump but there was no suspense so it was not lasting. It wasn't boring but it wasn't amazing either. Technically very good let down by a conflict of horror and comedy that was not deliberate. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 06/29/23 Full Review Audience Member Didn't make it past the 5 minute mark Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 02/06/23 Full Review Audience Member kind of weird but if you watch till the end its actually alright Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 02/26/23 Full Review Audience Member Confusing,boring,and just simply bad. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 01/16/23 Full Review Audience Member It gets no points for its completely unoriginal story but in the times of all these depressing, doom and gloom horror films it was refreshing to see one that was actually kinda fun. Plus the Reeker was pretty cool looking and featured the best use of the jittery effect since the House On Haunted Hill remake. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 01/26/23 Full Review Audience Member A few months ago I posted a positive review of a little horror movie called "Reeker". It told of an unknown entity which stalked a stranded group of friends in the middle of the desert. It was creative and surprising... tonight I watched it's sequel, or rather prequel. "No Man's Land" is a steaming pile of shit. The first 15 minutes take place in 1978 and we get a back-story of how the Reeker came to be. There's some cool and genuinely gruesome stuff in this brief intro, but then the movie jumps to "present day", which is actually set just before the first film. It's basically a half-arsed rehash of the first movie. There is nothing inspiring about it and it's acted atrociously. The movie was written and directed by the same guy but I have no idea what he was thinking? Even in script form there is no way he could have possibly thought this was improving on the original. I don't understand the logic behind this movie when there was potential to turn the story into a nice little franchise. Enough said, No Man's Land sucks. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 02/08/23 Full Review Read all reviews

No Man's Land: The Rise of Reeker

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now