Path of Destruction

Audience Reviews

View All (3) audience reviews

robert p Having a science background, I must say this is the most cheesy sci-fi I have ever watched. Soooo many things are wrong. Nano's are super small and cannot be seen by the naked eye, but in this movie they grow big. Also medically speaking you do not put an IV in a hand with just a little piece of tape because it's easy to pull out. All in all this movie gets one star because any special effects are so cheesy! Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review Audience Member One lame TV movie production starring before-famous Chris Pratt. Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 02/04/23 Full Review Audience Member Path of Destruction (Stephen Furst, 2005) About the best thing I can say about this movie is that without it, I'd have never known that the mind-numbingly beautiful Danica McKellar, for whom I would sometimes get over my complete aversion to The Wonder Years and choke down an episode, still has a career. Other than that, I have to apologize to my body for leaving it in a chair long enough to watch this piece of garbage. McKellar, the crusading reporter, teams up with a climatologist (Everwood's Chris Pratt) to try and foil an ever-expanding cloud of nanotech robots that have hitched themselves to a major storm front and are devouring everything in their path. No, folks, I kid you not. The main question that kept going through my mind was, "someone from Everwood needed money this badly?" It's somewhat amusing that the only character in the movie who made it at all interesting was played by the director himself. Give me a whole movie about a beer-swilling sex-starved weather station employee, and I'll trade this AND The Day After Tomorrow for it. 1/2 Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 02/11/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Path of Destruction

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW