Quigley Down Under

Audience Reviews

View All (670) audience reviews

Samuel B While this isn't on a par with Unforgiven or True Grit, it is a quality entry into the western ethos. Simon Wincer, the director, did pay attention to little details. Quigley and Cora having raspy voice at first among the Aborigines following their near dehydration, for example. Mostly, Wincer paid decent homage to Australia and the customs of the time this was set in, the 1890s. Selleck was well cast as Matthew Quigley, giving a good portrayal of a decent and heroic Bunyanesque figure. Laura San Giacomo was wonderfully playful and lost and freely over the top with her lively portrayal of Crazy Cora. She was convincingly nuts while still being endearing. Of course Ben Mendelsohn shows prominently, not yet the star he has become, but with a slight promise of the potential on the horizon as the villain sidekick O'Flynn. The one that steals the movie, though, is Alan Rickman as Elliot Marston, the villain. He portrays Marston, as he did in Die Hard, as the villain you love to hate. The supporting cast is credible, if not spectacular. That is a drawback. It is not, however, a large enough drawback to destroy the film as some critics have intimated. Nor are the pacing and story issues. It is a decent, if not spectacular, story fairly told Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 06/27/24 Full Review Merrianne M I absolutely loved this movie when it came out and still do. Those that criticize it must not understand it's supposed to be a lighter western . Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 06/17/24 Full Review Nathan W You know something... I think Tom Selleck could have had a career in Westerns. He has a certain ruggedness and charm that really fits the genre. I know this movie got mixed reviews, but I thought it was a slightly above average take on the classic Western. For starters... Its hard to think of a more beautiful location to film in because the scenery was breathtaking. Tom Selleck and Laura San Giacomo had some chemistry together. Their witty banter provided much of the comedic value. The plot got surprisingly dark at times, which reflected the real life inspiration for the film. The acting was fine for the most part, the score was well done, and there was a decent amount of action. Granted the story wasn't all that interesting, but there was more than enough entertainment value. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 05/15/24 Full Review Lucia di L Such a boring movie. The worst thing in this movie is Tom Selleck, because he is such a lousy actor. Best thing is Rickman. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 04/20/24 Full Review Audience Member Tom Selleck gets to display all the charm and movie star qualities that initially got them cast as Indiana Jones. In this film we get to see just what that may have looked like. Obviously Harrison Ford was fantastic and completely owned that role. By watching this film it’s clear select would’ve excelled as wellRickman fantastic as the villain sequences on a satisfying ending Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 01/09/24 Full Review Todd R I'm sorry the critics are sinacal about this movie, but they always like the movies that no one likes. I've seen it more times than I can count and always enjoy it, imo it's a classic western with a great believable cast. The critics wouldn't know a good movie it it bit them. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 08/25/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Quigley Down Under

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now