The Boogeyman II

Audience Reviews

View All (25) audience reviews

Elvis D Si bien la película anterior no era un excelente slasher, igual era una película entretenida y disfrutable. Esta secuela ofrece poco y se queda demasiado corta para ser considerada una secuela. Gran parte de la película consiste en resumir lo que se vio en la película anterior por medio de algunos flashbacks que terminando ocupando la mitad de esta película. Eso y la narración de la superviviente mientras sus compañeros de Hollywood discuten para planear hacer una película basada en dichos eventos. Se podría decir que la verdadera trama de esta secuela no empieza hasta llegar a la última media hora que queda de película. Eso hace que la película se sienta como un prólogo demasiado largo y los flashbacks acaben siendo puro relleno. La trama es demasiado corta y apenas existente. Esta película usó la misma fórmula que en "Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2", pero de una mala manera haciendo que casi no haya trama para una continuación. Se nota que aquí el presupuesto está mucho más limitado que el de la película anterior. Las escenas de muerte son mayormente absurdas y eso que son pocas. Boogeyman 2 acaba siendo una secuela innecesaria que no se puede tomar en serio y un desperdicio por tratar de continuar una película que ya es de culto. Mi calificación final para esta película es un 4/10. Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 06/05/23 Full Review Audience Member Nearly an hour or so is a recap of the previous installment accompanied with the narration with original film scenes. Then a few lazy kills we've all seen before. A sequel that shouldn't have been. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 02/22/23 Full Review sonny p Vad i helvete var det jag just såg!? haha! Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review Audience Member Going With The So-Called Director's Cut (Titled Redux In The UK). This Version Of The Film Is Just The First Film With Segments Every So-Often Of Ulli Lommel (Director Of The First Film), As Mickey Lombard, Being Interrogated As A Suspect To The Murders Of The First Film. I Would Love To See The Original Version By Director Bruce Starr As Some Segments Of The Original Were Used At A Sped Up Pace & You Couldn't See What Was Happening. Sadly This Original Has Been Apparently Destroyed. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 01/21/23 Full Review Audience Member It was a decent follow-up. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 01/16/23 Full Review Audience Member Im not overtly a fan of the first Boogeyman mostly because the pacing is a bit whack but it's sequel is a piece of shit. Strictly a cash in on the original there is hardly a movie here. Clocking in @ less then 80 minutes half of this is flashbacks & what remains is so low budget, poorly written, acted & structured it makes Wes Craven (who pulled the same bullshit) w/ The Hills Have Eyes 2 look respectable. Now I shouldn't shit on a movie too much that is riddled w/ flashbacks because I love Silent Night Deadly Night 2 but that movie is high entertainment gold. Boogeyman 2 is like diarrhea in a film can. Ulli Lommel is a whore that takes it in the shitter. He may think that he's thumbing his nose @ Hollywood but you know he really wants to give them a blow job just for the money Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 01/27/23 Full Review Read all reviews

The Boogeyman II

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW