Rotten Tomatoes
Cancel Movies Tv shows RT App News Showtimes

A Wrinkle in Time

Play trailer Poster for A Wrinkle in Time TV-PG 2003 2h 9m Kids & Family Adventure Fantasy Play Trailer Watchlist
Watchlist Tomatometer Popcornmeter
Tomatometer 3 Reviews 40% Popcornmeter 5,000+ Ratings
Three celestial beings (Alfre Woodard, Kate Nelligan, Alison Elliott) help two children travel through time to find their father and his lab partner.

Critics Reviews

View More
John Leonard New York Magazine/Vulture 01/25/2018
Disney, you will be relieved to hear, has done a decent job of adapting A Wrinkle in Time for television... Go to Full Review
Common Sense Media Editors Common Sense Media 01/01/2011
3/5
Somewhat clunky but mostly faithful to the book. Go to Full Review
John J. Puccio Movie Metropolis 11/17/2004
5/10
I haven't read the book, but I can't imagine, given its popularity, that it would have been read by as many people as it has if it were as mundane as this movie. Go to Full Review
Read all reviews

Audience Reviews

View More
A.J. G 6d More faithful to the book than the 2018 version, but the special effects are TERRIBLE. See more Joshua T Aug 7 In this period of being transparent, I fully admit that this movie is not the greatest. That said, the reason why I'm giving it four and a half stars anyway is because it happens to be one of my favorite movies of all time. Much of that is due to nostalgia as I grew up with this film, but as I've grown older and continued to rewatch it, there have been other aspects that I've really grown to appreciate independently of my nostalgia for the movie, most especially the soundtrack. I will maintain that the soundtrack of this movie is at the top of my favorite soundtrack list. Also the writing, though sometimes corny, does come across as earnest and the teen/child actors do a remarkably good job. The special effects are really bad. Like it-almost-looks-like-a-Windows-screensaver-at-times bad at best, and nightmare fuel inducing at worst. They weren't great even by 2003 standards, and have only grown worse over time. That said, if you're willing to look past it, they are serviceable. (And I don't mind them at all considering that I'm very nostalgic for this movie) All in all, I honestly think that while the 2018 film Is technically better as a film, I still 100% prefer this version, especially as an adaptation of the book (which I also love). The 2018 film in my opinion did not do the book justice in many ways, while this, the 2003 film, does do the book justice despite all of its many, many flaws. I strongly recommend it to anyone who has my taste, which to be fair is probably not very many people See more max a 10/09/2022 I haven't read the novel this movie was based on, which I assume would have cleared a lot of my confusion, still I find the movie decent enough. Sure, most of the time it's a rollercoaster and it feels hard to follow, but at least David Dorfman's performance was good. See more 04/12/2022 Funny and original!!!!!!!!!!!! See more 10/18/2021 NOPE THIS 2003 MOVIE SCARY ME I WAS 1 YEAR OLD BACK IN 2003 BECUSE I WAS BORN IN 2002 ON AUG 15TH ! I'M NOT 🤡 ? See more 04/29/2021 I loved it! Yes it was a bit different than the book but it was close enough. I loved Mrs. Whatsit flying into the kitchen as a crow & transforms into a human. The best was the the cast. They pick the best people for the roles. See more Read all reviews
A Wrinkle in Time

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Movie Info

Synopsis Three celestial beings (Alfre Woodard, Kate Nelligan, Alison Elliott) help two children travel through time to find their father and his lab partner.
Director
John Kent Harrison
Screenwriter
Susan Shilliday
Production Co
Paramount
Rating
TV-PG
Genre
Kids & Family, Adventure, Fantasy
Original Language
English
Release Date (Streaming)
Nov 8, 2016
Runtime
2h 9m