Rotten Tomatoes
Cancel Movies Tv shows FanStore News Showtimes

Spiker

Play trailer Poster for Spiker R 2007 1h 30m Horror Play Trailer Watchlist
Watchlist Tomatometer Popcornmeter
Tomatometer 0 Reviews 4% Popcornmeter 100+ Ratings
After escaping from an asylum, a serial murderer stalks a group of teenagers in an abandoned building.

Where to Watch

Spiker

Audience Reviews

View All (18) audience reviews
Audience Member Spiker is another low-budget shot-on-video slasher movie. This one, however, takes it in a different direction. There are several creative ideas in this movie, sadly the movie itself wasn't as creative as it definitely could've been. The movie isn't terrible, but it's by far not the best. The movie suffers from very poor continuity. How does the spiker keep randomly getting railroad spikes despite leaving the spikes embedded into the bodies of those whom he kills. The shots aren't terrible but they could've been a little bit better, not bad shots though. The killer at least is intimidating and is pretty cool. The acting isn't the worst acting I've ever seen, but then again, it could've been way better. Decent movie, but had much more potential than it used. Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 01/17/23 Full Review Audience Member so stupid it is hilariously funny Rated 2 out of 5 stars 01/29/23 Full Review Audience Member ...so you're probably wondering how it came to pass that I would watch a straight-to-DVD horror/supernatural/low-budget mess like SPIKER, and believe me when I tell you that explaining why I saw it will be a lot easier than explaining the movie itself. The truth is, on the final day of class for one of my film courses at the high school, the one student I had left on that day arrived with the film and told me that it came on a recommendation as being one of the "worst films ever." Despite my snobbery, he all but demanded that we watch it. We laughed our asses off. I can imagine the creators of SPIKER sitting around and trying to decide on a unique concept for a horror film: Director:"Hey, I've got it! How about a mute, albino serial killer who communicates only by slamming the heads of two polished railroad ties together?" Writer: "That sounds awesome! And he kills people with the spikes he's always slamming together!" Director: "Totally! We could call him "the Spiker." Writer: "Oooh, creepy! And let's see...maybe we could have him stumble upon a cabin in the woods filled with isolated and horny teenagers." Director: "I love it. See, this is why I hired you, man. To come up with these awesome original ideas. Can you throw a ghost in there too, though? I want to make sure that we really scare people!" And that, in a nutshell, is SPIKER, a film you would only watch if you believe in the entertainment value of "so bad it's good"-types of movies. I think there's an age at which these kinds of films appeal to young men especially, and I'd be lying if I said I never went through that period (though they were always best viewed with alcohol). But I'm fairly certain that this period in my own life is over, and now I try not to waste time on stuff like this. The series of laughable moments in SPIKER never seems to end, and you can enjoy this hellaciously bad film if you can resist asking too many questions. But therein lies the problem. Because a rational mind will wonder: What's with the really bad special effects? How does Spiker replenish his supply of spikes when he only seems to have two on him and yet he leaves the spikes in the bodies of the people he kills? What's with the creepy uncle, a cross between Johnny Depp and a professional wrestler? How does one teenager get pinned to a wall by Spiker and then manage to be stabbed my a mysterious third arm holding the spike? Did this director learn the word CONTINUITY in film school? The answer to that last one is probably, "film school? What film school?" Before SPIKER ended, my student--who had made a horror film of his own for a class project--said, "I think my movie is better than this." Indeed, Charlie. Indeed. Heinous acting. Time/space continuity errors in the story. Laughably bad and unmotivated frame composition. A whiff of a strory idea gone senselessly awry. SPIKER. The scariest part of the movie? The prospect of a sequel. Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 01/29/23 Full Review Audience Member I could not get to the end of it because it just seemed to predicatable. I loss interest quickley as my mind began to turn to mush. Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 02/03/23 Full Review Audience Member Ugh. No, no, no, no, no! I got so tired of seeing the killer attempt to scare you with the railroad spikes and that corny sound that accompanied it. The whole thing was just awful. I was actually glad everyone was dying. Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 01/20/23 Full Review Audience Member do you like close shots with bad acting? how do you feel about over dramatic music? Wouldn't every slasher film be better if there was a spectral element to it? when this movie itsn't being a cheap cliche of itself, I almost want this to be a good cheesy movie but it just falls short. Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 02/18/23 Full Review Read all reviews
Spiker

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Cast & Crew

Movie Info

Synopsis After escaping from an asylum, a serial murderer stalks a group of teenagers in an abandoned building.
Director
Frank Zagarino
Producer
Michael J. Hein, Frank Zagarino
Screenwriter
Richard Preston Jr.
Production Co
Laurel Lane Pictures, Moodude Films
Rating
R (Language|Violence|Some Sexuality)
Genre
Horror
Original Language
English
Release Date (Streaming)
May 9, 2019
Runtime
1h 30m
Most Popular at Home Now