S.W.A.T.: Under Siege

Audience Reviews

View All (26)

Mark B This is awful. The story is dumb, the writing is so bad. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 04/18/25 Full Review Space C Just watch the 2003 S.W.A.T movie, it's so much better in comparison to this and the 2011 version (S.W.A.T Firefight.) Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 02/18/25 Full Review Aran G Tarnishes the SWAT name. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 04/16/24 Full Review Timothy D I believe they filmed this on an iphone. Think of the worst community theatre show you have ever seen. The acting and directing in this are worse. I would think none of these people have jobs in Hollywood anymore. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 04/01/24 Full Review Mohamad A hardly logical, full of cliches, full of writing mistakes. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 01/11/24 Full Review Tom D I thought this would be bad, but I was wrong? It was so awful my eyes hurt. Everyone associated with this 'production' should live with shame. The writing and plot must have been devised by children, possibly with learning difficulties. Nothing makes sense, and it surely gives real SWAT a bad name. Avoid like your life depends on it. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 07/10/23 Full Review Read all reviews

S.W.A.T.: Under Siege

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now