chris m
english first, below spanish:
english:
the best part is the ending.
with a beginning that aims to be unusual and striking, 'predators' ventures into the realm of science fiction and action with the intention of revitalizing a mythical franchise. however, the result falls far short of expectations. despite being released at a time when technical advances already allowed for much stronger visual achievements, the special effects do not reach the level one would expect from a production of its era. in contrast, the cinematography shows flashes of skill and, at times, manages to recreate atmospheres that nostalgically recall the greatness of the original 1987 film.
the script, however, is its greatest weakness: superficial, fragmented, and lacking true dramatic development. the dialogues, far from adding nuance or building tension, fall into repetition and artificiality, as if each line were a faded echo of the previous one. the characters, although explicitly introduced, barely find differentiation among themselves, forming a flat and soulless ensemble. not even an actor of adrien brody’s stature manages to escape the generalized mediocrity of the cast, whose lack of authenticity translates into performances that feel forced and unconvincing.
the sound design and the score represent one of the film’s few tangible virtues: the music succeeds in evoking an atmosphere of psychological terror and mystery that, at times, elevates the tension beyond what the narrative itself achieves. the same cannot be said of the weapon effects, which sound weak and lacking impact, undermining the force of the action sequences.
the settings, evocative and at times powerful, connect with the spirit of the inaugural film, though the whole never comes close to reaching the level of intensity and freshness of that original. despite a beginning that flirts with spectacle, the film becomes entangled in clumsy narrative jumps and predictable decisions, resorting to plot twists so arbitrary that they shatter credibility.
the ending brings a certain degree of surprise and leaves room for ambiguous interpretations, and a few characters manage, at specific moments, to spark some interest. however, the restraint with which the predators’ presence is handled —perhaps in an attempt to make them more impactful— ends up being counterproductive, as their appearances are so controlled that they lose much of their menace.
in sum, 'predators' is a failed attempt to resurrect a legacy, caught between the monumental shadow of its predecessor and the inability to offer a fresh and forceful vision. a work that, despite its isolated efforts, cannot escape mediocrity nor claim a worthy place within the saga.
spanish:
lo mejor es el final.
con un arranque que pretende ser inusual y contundente, 'predators' se adentra en el terreno de la ciencia ficción y la acción con la intención de revitalizar una franquicia mítica. sin embargo, el resultado dista mucho de lo esperado. a pesar de situarse en un contexto donde los avances técnicos ya permitían logros visuales mucho más sólidos, los efectos especiales no alcanzan el nivel que cabría exigirle a una producción de su época. en contraste, el apartado fotográfico muestra destellos de oficio y consigue, en ciertos momentos, recrear atmósferas que remiten con nostalgia a la grandeza del título original de 1987.
el guion, sin embargo, es su mayor debilidad: superficial, fragmentado y sin verdadero desarrollo dramático. los diálogos, lejos de aportar matices o construir tensiones, caen en la repetición y la artificialidad, como si cada línea fuese un eco deslucido de la anterior. los personajes, aunque se presentan de forma explícita, apenas encuentran diferenciación entre sí, conformando un conjunto plano y sin alma. ni siquiera un actor de la talla de adrien brody logra escapar de la mediocridad generalizada del reparto, cuya falta de autenticidad se traduce en actuaciones que resultan forzadas y carentes de credibilidad.
el diseño sonoro y la música representan una de las pocas virtudes palpables del filme: la partitura sabe invocar un clima de misterio y terror psicológico que, por momentos, consigue elevar la tensión más allá de lo que logra la propia narrativa. no ocurre lo mismo con el sonido de las armas, que se percibe pobre y carente de contundencia, restando impacto a las secuencias de acción.
los escenarios, evocadores y en ocasiones poderosos, conectan con el espíritu del film inaugural, aunque el conjunto nunca logra alcanzar ni remotamente el nivel de intensidad y frescura de aquel. a pesar de un inicio que coquetea con la espectacularidad, la película se pierde en saltos narrativos torpes y decisiones previsibles, recurriendo a giros de guion tan arbitrarios que quiebran la verosimilitud.
el desenlace aporta cierto grado de sorpresa y deja espacio a interpretaciones ambiguas, y algunos personajes logran, en instantes puntuales, despertar interés. sin embargo, la contención con la que se maneja la aparición de los depredadores —quizá con la intención de dotarlos de mayor impacto— termina resultando contraproducente, ya que tienden a la contención de la aparición de los depredadores con el fin de hacerlos más misteriosos.
en suma, 'predators' es un intento fallido de resucitar un legado, atrapado entre la sombra monumental de su antecesora y la incapacidad de ofrecer una visión fresca y contundente. una obra que, pese a sus esfuerzos aislados, no logra escapar de la mediocridad ni reclamar un lugar digno dentro de la saga.
Rated 2.5/5 Stars •
Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars
08/19/25
Full Review
Audience Member
I liked the movie but felt is was really rushed. It would've been better to reel it out in a longer frame. Good cast, good acting, as you'd expect. I'm gonna keep it but felt like there was a lot of meat on the bones. Not sure why so much of the story involves humans fighting Predators when they're so interesting and so much material could be extracted from the aliens and what they are going through- I think it's what ALL the films have missed. Humans should be a subcontext in the story, not the source material. Anywho, good flick.
Rated 3/5 Stars •
Rated 3 out of 5 stars
08/09/25
Full Review
Austyn P
I thought this movie was interesting, and if it had an actual fully concrete ending, maybe even a 10/10, I just don't like that stupid reveal at the end.
Rated 4.5/5 Stars •
Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars
08/02/25
Full Review
Matthew L
This is one of my favorite Predator movies along with the very underrated Alien Vs. Predator. Its a solid 7 out of 10. It kept you guessing, introduced new Predators, and set up a sequel that could have taken us to the Predator homework. Those all seem like pluses to me.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
07/27/25
Full Review
Jordy M
From the very beginning, Predators manages to grab the viewer’s attention thanks to an unexpectedly solid cast and an immersive atmosphere. Discovering actors like Adrien Brody and Danny Trejo is a pleasant surprise—especially if you go in knowing little about the cast. As the film unfolds, it reveals an intriguing premise that blends science fiction, action, and suspense, all set in a jungle environment that echoes the original 1987 film, but with its own twist.
Visually, although some of the special effects may feel outdated for a 2010 production, the overall aesthetic is dark, overcast, and color-corrected to emphasize the lush greens of the jungle. The jungle itself functions almost as a character—mysterious, enclosing, and ideal for the predator-prey dynamic that the plot presents.
One of the film’s strengths is its return to suspense as a narrative tool, including clever traps, strange creatures, and group dynamics that build tension. Some visual compositions also stand out, such as group shots and scenes that creatively use the vertical space of the environment.
Throughout the story, the film introduces several characters with potential, though not all are fully developed. Some raise intrigue through hidden motives, while others feel oddly out of place or make questionable choices. Still, a few characters have memorable moments that enrich the narrative.
The movie also introduces new revelations that expand the Predator universe and add complexity—though not all of them are fully explored. The pacing remains swift, with consistent action scenes and moments of cleverness that harken back to the classic survival formula.
All in all, Predators isn’t a masterpiece nor does it reinvent the genre, but it delivers a solid, entertaining experience consistent with what you’d expect from this kind of action-sci-fi film. Its main strength lies in the creativity of its premise, the visual setting, and the ongoing tension of who will survive.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
07/17/25
Full Review
Matt K
I am not going to lie but you had to watch the first movie to understand it. But I loved the plot twists. Great movie.
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
07/17/25
Full Review
Read all reviews
Continue with Google
>
