London After Midnight

Audience Reviews

View All (42) audience reviews

Owen R I loved this film my favorite part was when batman came and said its batman time and started fighting darth vader and his pet dog slumbalicious dingleman in zimbabwae. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 04/26/23 Full Review Audience Member This is one of the most sought after lost films of the silent era. This was the most commercially successful collaborative film between Chaney and Browning. The storyline is somewhat incoherent and nonsensical. It is a story certain to disturb for its time. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 02/08/23 Full Review Audience Member One of the great lost films, but since you can't watch, it can only remain in the minds of us all who were fortunate enough to watch it, I sadly was not one of them. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 02/19/23 Full Review Audience Member Ranking for he short photograph version. Shows Lon Chaney's skill with disguise, you can feel the actors emotions in just photos. I was impressed Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 02/04/23 Full Review Audience Member Tod Browning and Lon Chaney deliver a classic horror. Unfortunately this is a lost film, and the only available version is comprised of still pictures. Therefore, this is very difficult if not impossible to score impartially. Having viewed this piecemeal version, I understood the story and again can only imagine the delivery from a master such as Lon Chaney. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 02/15/23 Full Review Audience Member Since a studio fire in 1967, all that remains of this 1927 silent film is a restored still-frame version - it is like a tantalizing glimpse into what could have been a great film... Still, it is remarkably good and boasts the rich masquerading talents of Lon Chaney. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 01/17/23 Full Review Read all reviews

London After Midnight

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW