Rotten Tomatoes
Cancel Movies Tv shows FanStore News Showtimes

Lolita

Play trailer Poster for Lolita R 1997 2h 17m Drama Play Trailer Watchlist
Watchlist Tomatometer Popcornmeter
69% Tomatometer 26 Reviews 75% Popcornmeter 10,000+ Ratings
A man marries his landlady so that he can take advantage of her daughter.

Where to Watch

Lolita

Lolita

What to Know

Critics Consensus

If it can't quite live up to Nabokov's words, Adrian Lyne's Lolita manages to find new emotional notes in this complicated story, thanks in large part to its solid performances.

Read Critics Reviews

Critics Reviews

View All (26) Critics Reviews
John Leonard New York Magazine/Vulture How does Lyne's Lolita compare with Stanley Kubrick's, back in 1962? It's superior in balance. Feb 1, 2018 Full Review Globe and Mail Rated: 2/4 Apr 12, 2002 Full Review Stanley Kauffmann The New Republic Shorn of Nabokov's language, as it must be, any film of Lolita, even one as adequately made as Lyne's, must seem somewhat gaunt. Jan 1, 2000 Full Review Mike Davies Birmingham Post This is an intelligent, faithful reading, suffused with a heady sense of atmosphere of a post war America that's also losing its innocence. Disturbing certainly, but the worst thing you can say is that it's a bit dramatically dull. Feb 2, 2023 Full Review Michael Wood The New York Review of Books Dominique Swain as Lolita is appropriately sulky and gawky, and she has a sudden, delayed smile which lights up the whole film whenever it appears. Aug 17, 2018 Full Review Cole Smithey ColeSmithey.com [VIDEO ESSAY] Although it is considered sacrilege in some circles to say it, Adrian Lyne's 1997 film version of Vladimir Nabokov's often banned 1954 novel is a vast improvement over Stanley Kubrick's beloved 1962 version. Rated: A+ Jul 5, 2015 Full Review Read all reviews

Audience Reviews

View All (959) audience reviews
Ralph R Adrian Lyne’s Lolita (1997) is a haunting and provocative adaptation of Vladimir Nabokov’s controversial novel. Despite being over two hours long, the pacing felt just right. The first act didn’t drag at all, and the transition to the second act was seamless, keeping me engaged throughout the film. Every scene felt necessary, with nothing added unnecessarily to stretch the runtime. The script was very well written and stayed true to Nabokov’s original novel. It captured the complexity of Humbert’s character and the disturbing dynamics of his relationship with Lolita. Jeremy Irons’ narration as Humbert added depth to the story, giving an intimate view into his twisted perspective while constantly reminding the viewer of the uncomfortable reality behind his justifications. The cinematography was outstanding, moving in harmony with Humbert’s narration. The film’s focus on Lolita’s legs and feet was a subtle but powerful visual choice, directly reflecting the meticulous and fetishistic way Nabokov’s Humbert describes her in the book. He often noticed her bare feet, her sandals, and the way she moved, emphasizing her youth and innocence while twisting those details into objects of his obsession. The camera captured this fixation without needing explicit explanations, immersing the viewer in Humbert’s distorted mindset. The soundtrack was beautifully done, complementing the film’s emotional shifts. It expressed Humbert’s feelings, from his infatuation and longing to his jealousy and guilt. The music never overwhelmed the scenes but added a layer of emotional complexity that made the film even more immersive. Adrian Lyne’s direction brought intentional discomfort. The lingering on certain scenes and objects, like Humbert’s stairs, was not random. These moments were designed to make the viewer feel trapped in the same uneasiness as Humbert’s world. It forced me to sit with the moral weight of the story and think about the darkness behind Humbert’s actions. While they echo Humbert’s fixation and Nabokov’s descriptions, they can feel exploitative in a medium as visual as film. This stylistic choice makes the audience complicit in Humbert’s gaze, which is arguably the point, but it may alienate viewers or overshadow the film’s critique of his behavior. Adrian Lyne’s Lolita is a visually stunning and narratively complex film, but it is not without its flaws. It is undeniably ambitious, tackling one of the most difficult stories in literature, and it does so with technical brilliance. However, the film's reliance on Humbert’s perspective and its sensual style raise questions about how effectively it critiques its protagonist and the story’s darker themes. Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 11/27/24 Full Review Courtney K ahhh idk; i didn't think this was that good. & I struggled to actually believe his attraction to her - she was a brat. Rated 2 out of 5 stars 11/10/24 Full Review Alexis W Coming from the lens of Humbert being a unreliable narrator, and Nabokov's original source material, this movie is very...conflicting. I feel like they certainly could of shown more of Dolores slipping through Humbert's unreliability. The true Dolores, what she was going through and the trauma she was living through. Dolores's character is hollow because of the perspective of the film, which does ring true to the book Lolita. But I feel like they could of added in more. The ending is heartbreaking, this film is worth a watch and isn't bad. Rated 3 out of 5 stars 10/02/24 Full Review Shioka O It's worth watching to see two leads performance even though it doesn't beyond the classic by Kubrick. Voice-over by Jeremy Irons always wins. Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 07/25/24 Full Review VICTORIA A What a sad story for Dolores. It’s hauntingly sad. Really amazing performances by all. Really wish I hadn’t watched it because it’s so disturbing and heartbreaking. Rated 3 out of 5 stars 06/27/24 Full Review Jason Such an amazing performance by both leads. It always baffles me why Swain didn't excel after this film. Rated 5 out of 5 stars 11/22/23 Full Review Read all reviews
Lolita

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Cast & Crew

The Thief 88% 87% The Thief Watchlist Firelight 41% 82% Firelight Watchlist Nothing to Lose 44% 29% Nothing to Lose Watchlist Jude 80% 73% Jude Watchlist Discover more movies and TV shows. View More

Movie Info

Synopsis A man marries his landlady so that he can take advantage of her daughter.
Director
Adrian Lyne
Producer
Mario Kassar, Joel B. Michaels
Screenwriter
Stephen Schiff
Production Co
Guild, Pathe UK, Lolita Productions
Rating
R
Genre
Drama
Original Language
English
Release Date (Streaming)
Jan 12, 2017
Box Office (Gross USA)
$1.4M
Runtime
2h 17m
Sound Mix
Surround
Most Popular at Home Now