The Battle of Neretva

Audience Reviews

View More

Erik L @RT64170752 Aug 4 A beautiful film that is difficult to watch due to the piercing emotion that runs throughout. It's a testament to suffering and rebirth with excellent acting and a great screenplay. Although it was made during a time of propagandistic, post-war films, it's an emotional rollercoaster. It's strange how it didn't win an Oscar. See more Cameron M @Cameron11 11/14/2021 Yugoslav war film with great battle sequences but weak character development. The film shows the Yugoslav army trying to defend itself from the Axis powers and the Chechens. The most impressive part of the film is the cinematography and battle scenes. The acting is pretty good as well. However, the character development for some of the characters appear to be lacking. The three siblings do not have as much character development as I would have hoped for a film that's over two and a half hours long. The editing could have been much better; some scenes have distracting quick cuts in the middle of conversations. Also, the film seemed to forgot about the German forces as the German commander is present throughout and never makes another appearance and the German officer decides to stop attacking and take a more defensive position but outcome of the German side is not sufficiently explained. I thought that Welles was miscast in his role as the leader of the Chechens. Unlike Brenner, all I saw was Orson Welles each time he was onscreen which sometimes took me out of the film. The film was nominated for Best Foreign Language Picture but lost to Z. I haven't seen the other nominees so I can't say if it deserved to win or lose. Overall, the film is an engaging and intriguing war film with great battle scenes but mediocre editing and character development. See more 02/23/2019 one of the best war movies See more lars p @LarsP 04/13/2014 OMG, sooo looong & so boring. Lots of screaming, lots of explosions in the background, very few decent battle scenes and NOTHING worth watching it for. The most expensive Yugoslav movie ever made. Well, maybe making movies is not their forte. I'm being nice, very nice: One star. See more Ola G @Ollie1972 09/18/2013 In January 1943 the German army, afraid of an allied invasion from the Balkan, launched a great offensive against yugoslavian partisans in Western Bosnia. The only way out for the partisan forces and thousands of refugees was the bridge over the river Neretva... "Battle of Neretva" was the first of the huge state-sponsored World War II film productions. It had a staggering budget approved personally by Yugoslav president Josip Broz Tito. Different sources put it anywhere between $4.5 million and $12 million. Global stars such as Sergei Bondarchuk, Yul Brynner, Franco Nero, Orson Welles, etc. flocked to communist Yugoslavia attracted by the huge sums of money being offered. Shot over 16 months with funds put up in largest part by over 58 self-managed companies in Yugoslavia, the movie featured a combined battalion of 10,000 actual Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) soldiers. Four villages and a fortress were especially constructed for the film, and subsequently destroyed. Countless Soviet-made T-34 tanks that were touched up to look like German Tiger I tanks met the same fate. Additionally, an actual railway bridge over Neretva River in Jablanica was destroyed. Director Bulaji's justification for taking down an actual bridge rather than getting the shots in studio was that a destroyed bridge would later become a tourist attraction. The bridge was thus blown up, but because none of the footage was usable due to the billowing smoke that made it impossible to see anything, it was decided that the bridge should be repaired and destroyed again. However, the problem with the excessive smoke occurred even when the bridge was blown up for the second time. Finally, the scenes of the bridge being blown up that eventually ended up in the film were shot using a small scale table-size replica at a sound stage in Prague. Throughout the movie's production, Yugoslav public was informed about the shooting progress through pieces in the country's media. And the movie took 16 months to shoot and complete. I have never heard about this big ensemble piece before, and when seeing the top names involved you would think this is a pretty interesting WWII movie. Which it is on one hand, but at the same time it´s extremely theatrical particularly in the acting, incoherent in many ways, the version I saw was dubbed in german and it just drags on for way too long without really getting anywhere. I assume the movie was originally shot in yugoslavian, but did Yul Brunner and co speaks english in the original print? Confusing.. I was banning the dubbing throughout the movie. Despite the massive budget, an intriguing part of the WWII history and gigantic battle scenes, "Battle Of Neretva" just couldn´t fully win me over. See more 01/27/2013 hrpetina trea, stereotipa, povijesnih neto?nosti i naravno sve upakirano u jeftin crveni propagandni celofan bivseg YU reima.. See more Read all reviews

The Battle of Neretva

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING