isla s
I thought this was an interesting story. It'd be hard not to feel sorry for Nigel as a child, given his somewhat chaotic domestic situation at times. It is somewhat cheesy and nostalgic but I enjoyed it for the most part. I liked the Dusty Springfield songs played in the background towards the end. I thought it was interesting hearing Freddie Highmore's English accent, considering I'd only ever seen him in American shows and films before (he is English, I believe). I also thought Helena Bonham Carter gave another decent enough performance. Not a bad film, not really stand out memorable but not awful, it's worth a watch, yes.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
03/31/23
Full Review
Audience Member
I thought this was gonna be quirky and fun 2.1
Rated 2/5 Stars •
Rated 2 out of 5 stars
09/05/21
Full Review
Audience Member
Lovely movie. Helena Bonham Carter and Freddie Highmore doing an amazing job as always
Rated 5/5 Stars •
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
02/08/23
Full Review
Alan D
Dreary movie, great great set design and some good performances from the "young Nigel" and "Mrs Potter/Slater" , but overall disappointing. I actually felt sorry for the Mrs Potter character as cooking/cleaning was her raison d'être and Nigel (and the filmmakers) choose to portray her as some kind of monster.
Rated 2.5/5 Stars •
Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars
02/28/21
Full Review
Audience Member
Dull characters: the 1960s are the real star.
If you like Dusty Springfield or would simply like to be transported perfectly, exquisitely back to the mid 60s and early 70s, you will enjoy "Toast", a cinema adaption of food writer Nigel Slater's autobiographical memoir of his 1960s and 70s Wolverhampton childhood. The clothes, houses, cars, even sweets of the mid 1960s and early 1970s are beautifully reproduced. The Art Director must have haunted auction houses, had 1960s "Simplicity" patterns made up again, found the perfect beige Rover saloon, and the joiners built a perfect 1960s kitchen. Dusty Springfield sings at key points and of course we also see her album "Where am I going" and its turn on a Dansette. Part of your ticket price is in effect a Museum admission, so perfect is your experience.
So skilful is the recreation of the 60s that even the opening credits are by means of long forgotten 60s products on the corner shop shelves with the names of the cast, Writer and Director cleverly stencilled onto them. However if you wish to see characters that skilfully made in Slater, his parents or his stepmother, you might not be so happy. Where, as you look round the 60s kitchen and dining room everything is interesting, unusual, redolent, if you try to understand much about the characters beyond the dislike between son and father or stepmother, you'll find almost nothing.
The characters are not completely free of depth, even if their attempts to communicate always fade. The gorgeous, raucous stepmother the cleaner, Mrs Potter, played superbly by Helena Bonham Carter tries briefly to find common ground with the child Slater, before reverting to threats. Her character might be some sort of cook-up itself, chain-smoking expressively, always in a 60s curtains one-piece, communicating with her new husband by cooking alone. I wonder if there's some gay dislike of women in this character. More likely it is simply the determined method of the film to have a 3D 1960s, some slapstick, and 2D characters for us to do the best we can with.
Curiously a single character does talk articulately and explain the world around him: Slater's pal at school, who spews out the kind of adult wit and knowledge that American screenwrites like for their grotesque child stars: is the writer simply showing that they really can do dialogue, though they've been forced otherwise to write silent simpletons?
Perhaps many father/son relationships of that era were that distant and silent, mine pretty much was. There was less feeling that fathers need find time or try to talk much to their children if they didn't want to – they were bringing home the bacon and that was enough: we're a million miles from that world now. I wonder if Slater's autobiography would fill us in a lot on this relationship; it's hard for cinema to portray a silent, stuttering relationship like this, and a lot is required of the viewer in experience and imagination. Even I, a contemporary with I think a similarly distant father, felt dumbfounded. Maybe I miss the point; the film avoids the human profundities in order to take us on a delightful ride through the 1960s and early 70s, as light and simple as a Slater soufflé, with some slapstick to keep us amused.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
02/19/23
Full Review
Audience Member
I first watched this movie in 2014(or 2015,I forget),I felt so amazed but sad,because Negel is one of the greatest chefs in Britain,and behind him,has such a strong sad story…
Rated 5/5 Stars •
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
01/28/23
Full Review
Read all reviews
Post a rating
>
