Aaron R
An absolute masterpiece! Reginald Rose's writing is poignant, thought-provoking, and evocative. This gripping tale will keep you on the edge of your seat from start to finish. Every character is very well-developed and we see each characters prejudices and assumptions come to light as the story progresses. Our protagonist is a wise and soft-spoken gentleman who does not let himself be swayed by the majority. Instead, he constantly searches for the truth and invites every juror to negotiate in a principled manner. The dialogues and stellar performances of the cast make this a must-see for fans of powerful storytelling!
Rated 5/5 Stars •
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
11/13/24
Full Review
Chan H
12 Angry Men is a classic American courtroom drama that examines the delicate balance between justice, prejudice and the power of doubt. Set almost entirely in a claustrophobic jury room, the film follows twelve jurors tasked with determining the fate of a young defendant accused of murder.
Even more than 60 years after its release, the film remains a reminder that the pursuit of justice often requires courage to question the majority and a willingness to engage in honest, critical dialogue.
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
11/13/24
Full Review
clarence c
’12 Angry Men’ is a wild rollercoaster ride. It portrays 12 male Jurors that are tasked with handling a young boy’s guilty or not verdict. In the beginning, the circumstances and verdict seem to be clear, then, the movie challenges the audience’s perceptions by slowly introducing new pieces of information in a calculative and effective way, to sway the audience’s emotions in all sorts of directions. In essence, the movie also proves the efficacy of principled negotiation when it comes to achieving a fast, wise, and amicable agreement between relevant parties, contrasted with the typical negotiation tactics focused on positional bargaining that would oftentimes lead to mis-catering of interests between one or even multiple parties. The movie portrayed a single juror, not intimidated by the ridicule and judgment of others, focusing on the relevant facts and utilising objective measurements to establish his argument. He successfully utilises certain aspects of principled negotiation to communicate effectively to the other jurors, opening the door to various opportunities by brainstorming, ultimately allowing a more informed decision to be made.
The movie also portrays the dynamics of different personalities involved in a negotiation very well. One might find that these dynamics are very real, and might be particularly relevant to them. Besides the fact that this movie is directed well, captivating and an all-around great movie, you should also give this a watch as you might learn a thing or two about leading discussions.
Rated 5/5 Stars •
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
11/11/24
Full Review
shermaine l
This movie portrayed a compelling view of justice, morality, and the power of negotiation. Set in a single jury room, this movie follows twelve jurors deliberating the fate of a teenage boy accused of murder.
At its core, the film exemplifies principled negotiation. The protagonist separates people from the problem, addressing biases and prejudices that cloud the judgment of his peers. By focusing on interests rather than positions, he shifts the discussion from a rigid "guilty versus not guilty" debate to a collective effort to uncover the truth. His logical reasoning gradually dismantle the prejudices of other jurors, leading to a unanimous and just verdict.
The film’s most compelling moments come from its use of creative problem-solving. The protagonist challenges the reliability of evidence through experiments and logical arguments, such as questioning the eyewitness’s ability to see without glasses or timing an old man’s walking pace. These tactics align with the book’s principles of inventing options for mutual gain, proving that rationality and persistence can overcome deeply entrenched biases.
Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed this movie as I gained insights on how principled reasoning can transform conflicts into resolutions. It was both entertaining and inspiring to see how they approached disagreements.
Rated 5/5 Stars •
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
11/10/24
Full Review
Isaac Lum '
The movie is a great example of on how principled negotiation is key to a successful end verdict.
Firstly, negotiators are people first, meaning they come into the discussion zone bringing their own emotions, priorities and interests. For example, Juror 7 cared more about watching baseball games so he was impatient throughout the discussion and did not care about fighting for a fair judgement for the accused boy. However, Juror 8's interest was to advocate for the boy's fair judgement, so he put his heart into analysing the crime. With such differences in interests in a group, it will be difficult for the negotiation to proceed well especially if the negotiators do not express them.
Secondly, negotiators should focus on interests instead of positions. The jurors arguing back and forth about whether the boy was guilty or not did not take the discussion anywhere. It was only through the process of negotiation that most of the jurors who initially voted the boy to be guilty understood Juror 8 and 9’s interest in advocating for a fair judgement for the boy and gradually became more open to unpacking the crime in greater detail to take a more informed position eventually.
Thirdly, negotiation should be based on objective criteria, meaning the negotiation is based on fair, moral standards and not pressure. Jurors 8 and 9 negotiated based hopes for a fair judgement for the boy, whereas Juror 7 changed his vote to 'not guilty' based on his impatience because he wanted the jury to end quickly so he could watch his baseball games. Should everyone be casting their vote based on pressure, it would only cause more conflict, as each person would not have a strong, convincing stance on the case, let alone base their arguments on principles and logic
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
11/09/24
Full Review
odelia c
The film 12 Angry Men explores the dynamics of a jury deliberating a murder trial. The jurors, each with unique communication styles, engage in a heated discussion. Some are logical and objective, while others are quick to judge or easily swayed by personal opinions. The film emphasizes the importance of effective communication, critical thinking, and empathy in reaching a fair verdict. It highlights how diverse perspectives can lead to better decision-making when approached with respect and understanding.
Rated 5/5 Stars •
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
11/09/24
Full Review
Read all reviews
>
