Charly

Audience Reviews

View All (148) audience reviews

Blobbo X Cliff Robertson amazing performance get 5 star. (Saw when came out at show, felt sad at end.) Book good too. Rated 4.5/5 Stars •  Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 12/04/24 Full Review steve d Cliff Robertson is the reason this melodrama works. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 03/30/23 Full Review Audience Member "What do you see in th[e] world?... [Asked to describe the things in the world as he sees them, as asked since his intelligence is new to the world.] Modern Science? C: Rampant technology, conscience by computer. Modern art? C: Dispassionate draftsmen. Foreign policy? C: Brave new weapons. Today's youth? C: Joyless, guide-less. Today's religion? C: Preachment by popularity poll. Standard of living? C: A TV in every room. Education? C: A TV in every room. The world's future Mr. Gordon? C: Brave new hates, brave new bombs, brave new wars. The coming generation? C: Test tube conception, laboratory birth, TV education, brave new dreams, brave new hates, brave new wars, a beautifully purposeless process of society suicide." Prophetic or what? The best visual scene, Charly's adolescence, follows the worst scene where Charly tries to force his teacher sexually. I think people particularly are wanting to hate on the fact that she likes him after his adolescence even though he attempted to sexually assault her, but I think the film was trying to say that she already was conflicted about her feelings for him up to that point already, he was not yet socially mature enough to understand the ramifications of his actions, and once he was back and emotionally matured she could accept him. Don't know if that is especially healthy, but it fits the narrative to make it at least plausible. The film has a number of cheesy moments and is a bit too forgiving of bad behavior and treatment of others, but it's philosophical questions are amazing. Would it be right to give genius intellect to someone just so they can have it stripped away a year later? Are minors responsible for their actions even though they are only responding to hormones through a lack of experience? What if you could see the world outside of your own biases to see things as they really are? Is the way that we treat those that are disabled appropriate and courteous? These are all well addressed by the film, and the character of Charly is very intriguing, despite the less than interesting side characters of the film. Even the correlations to Charly being a lab's guinea pig are handled pretty well. His fear at the end of losing his intelligence was perfectly addressed and terrifying, and the score was great. Saw this first in pieces throughout the years, and I'm glad I finally got to see it all the way through. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 01/23/23 Full Review jona i Not as impactful as it intends, but it has its few moments. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review Audience Member Works fine enough and Robertson is good. Doesn't come close to capturing the novel, though. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 02/03/23 Full Review Audience Member Charly (1968) C-103m. ??? 1/2 D: Ralph Nelson. Cliff Robertson, Claire Bloom, Lilia Skala, Ruth White, Dick Van Patten. Beautiful performance by Robertson as retarded man becoming genius after scientific experiment; he learns about romance and falls for his teacher Bloom. Based on the famous short story Flowers For Algernon by Daniel Keyes. I prefer the original story ending but otherwise terrific film. Robertson won Oscar. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 01/23/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Charly

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW