Jarhead 3: The Siege

Audience Reviews

View All (12) audience reviews

Why making a meaningless sequel? Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 08/09/23 Full Review G T Unimpressive acting, too many cliches(maverick marine and gung ho sexy blonde eg) and old style story of soldiers surrounded and attacked by fanatics. Only saving grace being the plot is believable though boring, plus there's lots of bullets and explosions. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 07/24/23 Full Review Alexander C Over acted and dam, how did they not run out of ammo? Story with huge promise, ruined with bad directing and a poor story arc. If you are bored and need a film for the background this may do, but anything else... i would say avoide. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 03/27/23 Full Review Audience Member Mindless crap. These guys have bottomless mags. Kind of like going to a cafe and paying for a bottomless coffee. All you can drink. The number of rounds these guys fired would mean they'd need to be supported by a truck carrying mags. standard mag is 30 rounds. Lets do a double tap shall we. Oh. That's 15 shots. Now. How many mags could you carry in a assault vest you reckon? John Wayne would be proud. Hell boy, them Kamanchehs l didn't stand a chance. Crap story, crap acting, crap! Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 01/30/23 Full Review Audience Member A truly awful part of the franchise and a complete piss poor reflection of the Marine Corps. Not one Marine changed his mag once, weapons were constantly on rapid fire, the only person to change mags once was the "spook" played by Sasha Jackson (who clearly paid attention in boot camp, either that or she has been using firearms for a long time because her discipline and situation awareness was on point compared to the rest of her co-stars. Waste of time and money. If you wanna make a war film that actually goes with the franchise maybe follow examples from the previous two films and hire a military advisor who wasn't in the military for maybe two seconds, someone with actual experience might help! Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 02/13/23 Full Review Audience Member Ok, where to start. First let me start with, this movie is bad. The only positive I have for it is, they had a good camera crew I guess. Everything else blows, script sucks, the acting is cringy af at times, "Hollywood physics", this is a must I guess, Hollywood made it. I could go on for days, bad sound effects, bad visual effects, the list goes on. If you are, or was, in the military, I'll go ahead and warn you the director obviously didnt get a veteran to help make anything realistic, all throughout the movie the main character can't even figure out if they have a left shooter's stance or a right shooter's stance, the guy goes back and forth not from one scene to the next but as he's moving down the halls. Left arm pit, right arm pit, make your mind up buddy. It's just one thing after another. Gun shot sound effects continuing after he clearly stops shooting. Actually I could see Mystery Science Theater 3000 getting hold of this and having a good laugh, honestly it's what kept me watching. It was so bad, it was good, good for a laugh. P.S. someone plz tell Hollywood if you are making a movie with actors portraying military personnel or anything military related in your film. Hire a veteran from that war (if possible), to consult with. It's the little things that drive us crazy. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 01/20/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Jarhead 3: The Siege

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now