Audience Member
Excellent western was a good ending. Yes I will highly recommend it James Welch, Henderson, Arkansas, September 26, 2023.
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
09/26/23
Full Review
Purvi Shah M
TestCommentby RTQA to verify if the review posts
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
07/25/23
Full Review
Michael K
Good Clint Walker role with a bonus Vincent Price role, as something other than Vincent's normal horror roles. Not much of a shoot-em-up movie, but had a good secondary love story line. It is because of this love story side, that I have to say the writers made a terrible mistake when Clint dies at the end. this was poor writing, could have had the same stand off, just let him live after being shot. Just terrible mistake by the writers!!!
My suggestion, quit watching when the word "....Fall" comes on the screen, will ruin the whole movie for you if you don't!!!!
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
07/25/23
Full Review
Audience Member
A good western from the sixties with the great Clint Walker as a ex-convicted trying to reconstruct his life out of the crime.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
01/23/23
Full Review
Audience Member
Interesting western had potential if it hadn't been so ham fisted. Clint Walker, who I always thought would have been the perfect Punisher, plays and infamous gunman released from prison and tries to go straight, leaving his reputation as "Killer Cain" behind him. In the 18 years in prison, the west has civilized some and he grudgingly joins an old west shooting show as the feature act, much to the chagrin of the show's previous star, a young hothead quick draw artist who romanticizes the old code of the gunfighter, men calling each other out and romanticizing killing in general. The film is thematically similar to Clint Eastwood's "Unforgiven" in regards to trying to unromanticize gunmen and killing, having an infamous gunman teaching a young kid that killing wasn't as honorable, brave or as justified as people thought it was. However, while thematically interesting, the film covers the themes in such a hammy way with Clint Walker trying to teach the young hot head that killing isn't an easy thing and more often than not involved shooting a man in the back. The film gets even weaker when the love of a good woman, Anne Francis, helps Walker find his way. But in the plus column, Vincent Price plays the shooting show owner and barker, and is as wonderful as always. With smarter writing, this could have been a strong revisionist western, but instead it's more of a middling western that's rather corny, though still worth watching.
Rated 3/5 Stars •
Rated 3 out of 5 stars
01/31/23
Full Review
Audience Member
More Dead Than Alive is a 1969 western starring Clint Walker, Vincent Price, and Anne Francis. It was a film that was released not long after the out-of-date Motion Picture Production Code (or Hays code) was discarded. As such, it featured more on-screen violence and a somewhat darker tone than was common for an average western film at that time. It was directed by Robert Sparr, who was mostly known for his TV work, directing many episodes of Lawman, Cheyenne, and The Wild Wild West. Thankfully, this movie didn't have the appearance of something made by a customarily TV director. It featured a lot quick panning, multiple angles, fast-editing, and unusual framing techniques. It's a film that, many years later, actually looks more sophisticated than it really is. That all being said, it's also a movie that fails to live up to its own style and execution. The story, while unorthodox and featuring an ending that had the potential to be very effective, never has any true momentum behind it. But the biggest problem with the movie is its ending, which attempts to be a down ending yet sails into the credits with a rousing and swelling number about Cain's character and his struggle. It's a tune that has no business in the final moments of this film. It goes beyond softening the blow to the point where the hit just doesn't connect at all, making all of the previous effort almost pointless. So it isn't a western that breathes a lot of air into the genre of yesteryear, nor is it a brutal assault on the genre in the early days of the New Hollywood era. It's more of a character study that tries to push the envelope a bit but tends to render itself moot rather than making any sort of a concrete point.
Rated 3/5 Stars •
Rated 3 out of 5 stars
01/26/23
Full Review
Read all reviews
Post a rating
>
