Rotten Tomatoes
Cancel Movies Tv shows Shop News Showtimes

Orgasm Inc.

Play trailer Poster for Orgasm Inc. 2009 1h 13m Documentary Play Trailer Watchlist
Watchlist Tomatometer Popcornmeter
86% Tomatometer 22 Reviews 56% Popcornmeter 1,000+ Ratings
A drug company races to develop the first approved Viagra for women.

Where to Watch

Orgasm Inc.

Critics Reviews

View All (22) Critics Reviews
Sheri Linden Los Angeles Times Canner's deft expos also makes clear that some of the highest-profile "experts" are shills for Big Pharma, and that genital mutilation is thriving in the West, in the form of cosmetic surgery. Rated: 4/5 Mar 31, 2011 Full Review David Lewis San Francisco Chronicle Can best be described as a compelling mess. Rated: 2/4 Mar 31, 2011 Full Review Wesley Morris Boston Globe Some subjects are so compelling that not even bad filmmaking can ruin them. And for most of "Orgasm Inc.'' it feels as if Canner is trying with all her might to do just that. Rated: 2/4 Mar 24, 2011 Full Review Richard Propes TheIndependentCritic.com A must-see for those with a deep interest in women's issues. Rated: 3.5/4.0 Sep 18, 2020 Full Review Fr. Chris Carpenter Movie Dearest A must-see for women and men alike. So long as the filmmaker sticks to disturbing facts and figures...(the movie) provides a stiff tonic indeed. Rated: B+ Apr 5, 2011 Full Review Gerald Peary Boston Phoenix [Shows] how the American pharmaceutical industry, in legion with famous doctors in its pay, has identified a disease, "female sexual dysfunction" (FSD), that they claim (dubiously) afflicts 43 percent of American women. Rated: 3.5/4 Mar 25, 2011 Full Review Read all reviews

Audience Reviews

View All (27) audience reviews
kolacats Wasn't the sequel to monster Inc I was expecting Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 11/13/22 Full Review alex t I don't understand the low rating. I have a feeling it's from those that didn't watch it, or are too prudish and can't stomach the subject matter. It's a very well structured documentary about the crazy story of One Taste. It's a wild story I recommend for anyone that enjoys documentaries. Spoilers ahead for the current state of the company... Also possible people are rating it poorly bc the story isn't tied up with a nice bow at the end. Unfortunately this company is still operating, despite being under investigation by the FBI.... And from the sound of things they will continue to do so. It can leave a really sour taste in your mouth, but that is at no fault of the director, that's just the sad state of things. Rated 5 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review yash b Interesting documentary that I certainly learned a lot from. Rated 3 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review Audience Member Liz Canner clearly had her mind made up before she started this documentary. How offensive for her to claim that female sexual dysfunction is a manufactured problem that only exists because a drug company wants to sell products. Was she hiding under a rock when Viagra first came out and women left and right were asking what about helping women who have dead libidos? I am 33, and six years ago I went from being very sexual with a healthy sexual appetite, to having a dead sex drive. Even on my own, I rarely have any sensation. I can orgasm maybe once a year. Mentally I'll be attracted to someone, but physically, I can't respond. How dare Liz, or anyone, try to say that this is a made-up problem, or a variation of normal? This documentary isn't clever or funny. It's misogynist and has the clear message of just lube up and lay back because we can technically still have sex, even if all it is it going through the motions. Why not allege that male sexual dysfunction doesn't really exist? Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 02/20/23 Full Review Audience Member Super interesting! Question: is living in the Brave New World bad as long as you are aware of it and making the choice? Don't get me wrong, I don't want to live there, but it seems to work for a lot of other people. Rated 5 out of 5 stars 02/21/23 Full Review Audience Member Doesn't Quite Make It to the Finish Line It isn't easy to make a really moving documentary about most subjects. This is the real reason Holocaust documentaries win so many Oscars; it's hard to make a documentary about the Holocaust that isn't compelling. (Though goodness knows I've seen it done.) There is a movement away from talking heads, and I think that's a good thing, but I don't like the direction a lot of filmmakers are choosing to take. In this one, for example, there was the ongoing conceit of the "race to FDA approval" for a Female Sexual Dysfunction medication. To demonstrate this, the film shows a little pink-coloured Viagra pill, among others, on little tiny legs running up a giant bed to a finish line at the pillow. It's silly the first time, and it doesn't get less silly as the film progresses. There's a lot of good material here, and I think there are interesting things said about our culture. I just don't think they're said very well. Obviously, we're dealing with an issue that goes way back; the film includes a brief stop at a museum of antique vibrators, something I wish I'd seen on my last trip to San Francisco. However, the problem has moved on from "hysteria." Now, the issue stems from women who don't have "hysterical paroxysms," as they were once called, either during intercourse or at all. It has been medicalized as Female Sexual Dysfunction, an overarching diagnosis that covers nearly half of all women in its broadest definition. Obviously, the company that can come up with an FDA-approved treatment for the condition will rake in billions. However, there is the not inconsiderable problem that women's orgasms are a bit more complicated than male erectile dysfunction is, and indeed, there is considerable debate over whether or not the condition even truly exists. As of the release of this film, none of the contenders had made it across that badly animated finish line in the US, though one is approved in the EU under certain conditions. So why aren't they sure it's a real condition? Well, one of the people interviewed was in a trial group for an electric box that was supposed to stimulate orgasm. Only it didn't. And then, she had one little statistic explained to her that made her realize she didn't even have a problem. You see, she was concerned because she wasn't having orgasms during penetrative intercourse. The statistic? Neither do at least seventy percent of women. She didn't have a medical condition; she was completely normal. It wasn't that she never had orgasms at all; it's just that she didn't have them when she thought she was supposed to. That's the thing; that forty-seven percent or whatever of women with this new condition includes women who [i]have[/i] orgasms, but not during intercourse. Rather than a pill, they clearly just need a map to give to their lovers. Or directions. Or something. There was a way around the problem, and it didn't require a prescription. One person in the film is shown insisting that people shouldn't take medications for anything, and I think that's just as wrong. After all, some women diagnosed with the condition have [i]painful[/i] intercourse, and that's a thing worth examining as well. It's actually possible that some small fraction of these women have a real medical problem. Others just need to understand their own bodies better, or they need lovers who do, or both. However, by lumping such disparate problems together, anyone who "solves" it with a drug can make a lot more money. Yes, it's in the best interests of the sex toy store owner to convince people that all they need is the proper toy. However, she won't make as much in the long run as the pharmaceutical companies. There are also no long-term negative effects to her products, which cannot be said for various of the other options people put forward over the course of the film. At least one is just horrific to me. That one, which is pretty much the only one widely available in the US, is surgery. It isn't just that director Elizabeth Canner insists that women who had their labia reduced for being too long (is this a worry normal people have?) now look more like children. It isn't even just the story of the woman who could have died when one of her sutures popped. It's that we're working so hard to try to get other countries to [i]stop[/i] performing unnecessary surgery on female genitalia, and it's becoming big business in the Western world. The film states that 80% of women have body issues. However, it doesn't distinguish between women like me, who legitimately have weight problems, with women who actually care if their labia match some standard that I didn't even know existed. There is good material here, and it could be interesting to have a dialogue on how women's sexuality has been treated by the predominantly male medical establishment. However, this movie is trying too hard to be flashy and interesting. I thought all you needed for that was sex. Rated 3 out of 5 stars 02/12/23 Full Review Read all reviews
Orgasm Inc.

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Cast & Crew

NoBody's Perfect 73% 87% NoBody's Perfect Watchlist The Beautiful Truth 47% 74% The Beautiful Truth Watchlist The English Surgeon 89% 98% The English Surgeon Watchlist Food Beware: The French Organic Revolution 57% 62% Food Beware: The French Organic Revolution Watchlist Vanishing of the Bees 58% 63% Vanishing of the Bees Watchlist Discover more movies and TV shows. View More

Movie Info

Synopsis A drug company races to develop the first approved Viagra for women.
Director
Elizabeth Canner
Producer
Elizabeth Canner
Production Co
Chicken And Egg Pictures
Genre
Documentary
Original Language
English
Release Date (Streaming)
Feb 18, 2017
Box Office (Gross USA)
$47.6K
Runtime
1h 13m
Most Popular at Home Now