The Wicker Man

Audience Reviews

View All (1000+) audience reviews

Kyle M The surrounding notoriety of “The Wicker Man” remade in 2006 starring Nicolas Cage effectively resurrected the story under piqued attention, which led to having the signature twist unveiled prematurely. 2006’s director Neil LaBute seemingly sought in cashing on the genre’s firmer foundations being reworked to further rust without much attributive originality to guarantee impressionable significance beyond the given reputation’s negative reception. It ideally been proven to work in going for the unfamiliar angle that supposedly modernizes how it was done previously, not for the better by the way. Robin Hardy’s directorial passion has gotten connected to the 1973 cultural take on pagan horror with an edgier grit ethically driven through an investigative narrative that’s been brewing the somewhat chills as the twists and turns been going back and forth, spiked by the decade’s stark saturation for an unsettling mixture. It unfortunately got affected by its own legacy, like most horror tales unable to separate from having an intimidating, timeless impact but rather as formulaic feats to self-destruct its fearful intentions. Though a notion been previously assured that such knowledge wouldn’t change the climatically built effect, if only it wasn’t so obvious that is, as well it doesn’t change the profound disturbance at the end. So which leaves performative deliverance in carrying the film besides its structural intelligence, exceptionally excelled by Edward Woodward and Christopher Lee with mesmerizing convictions over influential religious reliefs they had to embrace. Watching the original and remake back-and-forth easily declare a winner in the double feature when the latter’s approach showed frivolous, immature execution that visually parodies the circumstantially weighted gravity. The only provocative effect is to see the original if haven’t done so, to actually see how comparably bad and how much the remake lacks as it only replays the scenic direction in conversationally coerced matters that made the outing much lower than immediate predictability with misled “edge”. Because of that, it apparently lost the pull into welcomed slumber, contrast to the diegetic yearn. Even though there isn’t much enthusiasm towards the British film due to how disturbing it anchored, there’s no need to argue that the remake is soulless after witnessing what unfolded prior – unless star power actually becomes the appealing factor in terms of familiarity. Though with zero interest in ever seeing it nor any direct connections besides associated spirituality, Ari Aster’s “Midsommar” did, however, came to mind upon watching the traditional celebrations unfolded in the 1973 original, especially the tactics it’s characteristically used. Even without seeing it, just from a glance and narrative familiarity actually show true modernization of the story Robin Hardy directed and became one of the genre’s cherished influences to inspire effective frights. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 11/01/24 Full Review Arid S Well its up with the greats quite clearly, but im sure I will recieve critisism to say some parts where a tad cringe? The plot seemed glued together it didn't really hit me too hard? I feel bad about the way I have rated this but its my honest opinion. Rated 4.5/5 Stars •  Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 10/29/24 Full Review Audience Member Loosely based on the novel "Ritual" by David Pinner. After leaving Hammer Studios, Christopher Lee wanted to do something unconventional with screenwriter Anthony Shaffer, a horror film that involved the "old religion". After acquiring the rights to the Pinner novel, they wanted the film to be something more literate, without relying on the current convention of gore to be scary. What resulted was an intriguing mystery horror, pitting Christianity against Paganism. The filmmakers wanted to be as accurate as they could in the esoteric elements of the story, using their main resource Sir James Frazer's book "The Golden Bough". Music was also pivotally important to the narrative. There have been a few different cuts of the film, the most compelling being the 2001 Anchor Bay wooden box set that includes a rather interesting opening and an even more interesting dance segment the day before May Day. There is a deep-rooted complication to the ending between the two religions, brilliantly done with terrifying effect. An exquisitely made movie, one of the best. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 10/24/24 Full Review Peter v A creatively and stylefully shot horrorcomedy where the protagonist is a fool who is constantly in enraged shock by the outrageous agan habits of the small island soceity he is visiting to investigate the disappearance of a young girl. This unfolds into a delightful spiral into madness, as this royalist christian copper reveals himself not to be the kind that wants to save the heathens, but ultimately curse them when he finally realises he never had any resemblance of a upperhand at all. Something the audience was delightfully aware all along. The performances are all great, the set- and costume designs excellent. The movie shines in it's musical sequences where even our cleancut, prude protagonist finds himself enthralled and bewitched into experiencing and confronting his own desires to be sinful. Highly entertaining, would highly recommend. Rated 4/5 Stars •  Rated 4 out of 5 stars 10/12/24 Full Review Matt S An absolute masterpiece. A film you cannot place into any category; totally unique. Strangely uplifting too. Perhaps it's the community spirit that appeals ! You will have to watch it to understand. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 09/16/24 Full Review Edward P This is such an unsettling film. It’s brilliant. Rated 4.5/5 Stars •  Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 08/23/24 Full Review Read all reviews

The Wicker Man

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now