Transporter 3

Audience Reviews

View All (1000+) audience reviews

Jay W The movie speeds quickly through the setup so we can get to the main hook of the story. That being, Frank Martin (Statham) can not get 100 feet away from his car. If he gets out of that range, he'll explode. Meanwhile, evil Captain Planet villains want to pollute the environment. Senator Charles Nickels is being blackmailed and pressured to sign the pro-pollution deal. I know the setup is just an excuse to have Statham do action, but I just want to highlight the stupidity of the crew at the beginning of the movie. They open a thing of hazardous waste and begin to melt away because, and I quote: "There's got to be some booze around here." I don't mean to be insensitive to fictional dead people, but if they are really that dumb they kind of got what was coming to them. Now, let's talk about that Statham action. It is clear that Jason Statham has the skills to back up his action crime fighting persona. And this movie has some well written action scenes. There is one where he fights off 4+ men while preventing his coat from falling off the coat rack. Problem is, the scenes are not shot nor edited with any clarity, the movie is cut to pieces in the editing. Natalya Rudakova is Statham's passenger this time around. Her character came across more annoying than anything else. It is hard to buy any romantic chemistry when Frank Martin has had a different romantic lead in each of these films. The movie isn't without its cool moments. There are some cool action scenes on bikes, on trains and of course on cars. And in the end, that is really what people are looking for in these films. The franchise may be running low on gas, but it will still get you to where you need to go. Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 11/20/24 Full Review Dick C It's an excellent movie with good endings... Rated 4.5/5 Stars •  Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 07/15/24 Full Review POL P This movie was so bad it inspired me to get an account on here. The action scenes aren't particularly flashy, the romance part comes out of nowhere. Their are several gaping plot holes. Wouldn't recommend. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 02/18/24 Full Review Sam C I didn't manage to finish this film. I'm giving it a one out of respect for Jason Statham. The editing is in this is horrendous. The story is…. What is the story? Valentina is an annoying, poorly written, and poorly written character. Makes the character of Lai in the first film look like a Meryl Streep performance. Really disappointing as I quite enjoyed the first two. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 02/01/24 Full Review Audience Member 15 years later and this is a decent action flick Director Olivier Megaton helms the third entry in the franchise starring Jason Statham Frank Martin is back; he lives the same as he always has being a professional driver Things change though when an associate of his crashes into his home, a young girl is in the back seat, and the associate dies in an explosion in an ambulance Enter Robert Knepper as Johnson secretly moonlighting as an advocate for environmental protection but in truth he's scheming to hold Minister Leonid's daughter for ransom Unless he signs over all power to Ecocorp letting ships transport deadly chemicals Johnson will hold his daughter captive Frank is then hired against his will by Johnson to deliver the girl named Valentina; but there's a catch A special weaponized bracelet is locked to his wrist full of explosive chemicals If Frank steps more than 75 feet away from the car it'll kill him and Valentina This is more of an inverse of the original film; there's a love story again but the difference is that Frank is racing for his life literally The writers also insert some more environmental elements Some good action scenes, the villain is really cool cause he does have some depth, exotic European locations, a sizzling femme fatale, and the plot isn't too hard to follow This will please a lot of the female viewers seeing that Statham does get shirtless a lot doing his fighting scenes Yes there's a lot of jagged editing and fast sped up moments but its purpose is to entertain delivering that kinetic energy We also see more of Frank's sensitive side here The first film was a sleeper hit, the second one was stupid for sure but this one is a mindless actionier required to turn your brain off for its enjoyment Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 11/27/23 Full Review Joseph R ABout as bad a stupid as they come. You can tell a movie is going south and that the director and writers have no way to save it when they toss in sex. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 11/28/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Transporter 3

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now