Rotten Tomatoes
Cancel Movies Tv shows RT App News Showtimes

Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

Play trailer Poster for Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? 1966 2h 9m Drama Play Trailer Watchlist
Watchlist Tomatometer Popcornmeter
96% Tomatometer 45 Reviews 90% Popcornmeter 10,000+ Ratings
History professor George (Richard Burton) and his boozy wife, Martha (Elizabeth Taylor), return late one Saturday night from a cocktail party at the home of the college president, Martha's father. Martha announces that she invited another couple, newly appointed instructor Nick (George Segal) and his timid wife, Honey (Sandy Dennis), over for a nightcap. When the younger couple arrive, the night erupts into a no-holds-barred torrent of marital angst and verbal tirades.
Watch on Fandango at Home Stream Now

Where to Watch

Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

What to Know

Critics Consensus

Led by a volcanic performance from Elizabeth Taylor, Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? is a scathing adaptation of the Edward Albee play that serves as a brilliant calling card for debuting director Mike Nichols.

Read Critics Reviews

Critics Reviews

View More
Kate Cameron New York Daily News 03/10/2015
[Taylor] is nothing less than brilliant as the shrewish, slovenly. blasphemous, frustrated, slightly wacky, alcoholic wife of a meek, unambitious assistant professor of history at a university, over which her father reigns as president. Go to Full Review
Andrew Sarris Village Voice 03/10/2015
Nichols has actually committed all the classic errors of the sophisticated stage director let loose on the unsophisticated movies. For starters, he has underestimated the power of the spoken word in his search for visual pyrotechnics. Go to Full Review
James Powers The Hollywood Reporter 11/20/2014
The greatest credit for the implacable engagement that the film creates for its audience must go to the director, Mike Nichols. Nichols makes a stunning film bow with Virginia Woolf. Go to Full Review
Matt Brunson Film Frenzy Nov 12
4/4
It's one of the Academy's black marks that Richard Burton didn't win the Best Actor Oscar for his remarkable, career-capping performance. Go to Full Review
David Nusair Reel Film Reviews 10/19/2024
2.5/4
...an erratic yet sporadically electrifying drama... Go to Full Review
Keith Garlington Keith & the Movies 08/21/2022
4/5
There is simply no denying the strengths of “Virginia Woolf”, but your overall enjoyment may depend on your tolerance levels. Go to Full Review
Read all reviews

Audience Reviews

View More
Cineinthecity 05/10/2021 World-class acting all around See more Chuck A Dec 26 I REALLY have to hand it to Elizabeth Taylor, who heretofore had played mostly glamorous and/or heroic roles. But when the opportunity arose to play Martha in "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf," Liz FOUGHT for the role. It was a real change of pace for her, she gave it her all, and she RICHLY deserved the Oscar she got for it. I watch this movie last night on Kanopy, for only the second time in maybe ten years, and it was just as emotionally exhausting as it was the first time I saw it. See more Ava S @avawatches Jul 31 It's difficult to follow its many toxic drunken ramblings, but Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? strikes a chord with its evocatively sharp screenplay and powerful performances. See more Christian K @ckacar Jul 14 Obviously a film based on a stage production, the writing is clearly good but I did have trouble keeping up with the pace of the drunken babbling for 2 hours. See more Teddy B May 22 One of the most welcomingly uncomfortable film experiences ever, 'Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf' unravels with scathing cynicism and tension the equivalent of a ticking time bomb just waiting to explode. See more r r 10/16/2024 When Film Mirrors Reality: Cold Truths from “Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf” When was the last time you watched a movie that made your toes curl? Maybe for you it was during a Gorey horror movie, but for me it was during “Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf”. If you’ve seen this film before, you’d understand. It's because this film was based on a play written by Edward Albee. His sole goal in playwriting was to make the audience uncomfortable. He wanted to produce realistic representations of the way our society acts so that we can understand our problems. This movie is no exception. Directed by Mike Nichols and produced by Earnest Lehman, this film uses an intense plot and extensive symbolism to deliver an uncomfortable look into the realities of marriage, and the emotional violence it can bring. Releasing in 1966, this challenging film takes place in the early 60’s on a university campus house in the late hours of night. After a party, Martha (Elizabeth Taylor) and George (Richard Burton) invite a younger couple (George Segal, Sandy Dennis) over for drinks. The night spirals as the group indulges in heavy binge drinking, leading to copious arguments and fights. As the film progresses, we watch an innocent night be taken over by battle between 2 monsters striving for emotional damage. What made this movie so impactful for me was their brilliant use of symbolism. To begin, the constant drinking of alcohol throughout the film symbolizes the inherently broken and decaying nature of George and Marthas relationship. Over the course of the night, after countless drinks, they become increasingly sloppy and drained. Their physical deterioration due to alcohol resembles their relationship’s decay due to constant anger and emotionally violent “games”. Additionally, the use of the son made a great impact. He seems to represent the power struggle in their relationship. Constantly throughout the second half of the film, the son is being used as a weapon to hurt and humiliate. Even though he isn't real, he is the couple's way of asserting dominance and when George decides to “kill” him, I believe that symbolizes the end of their violent “games”. In the end, the use of symbolism in this film was a great device to highlight the intense struggles of marriage. Overall, this film was great. I must admit, it can be very uncomfortable at times. However, I said earlier that it was Edward Albee's mission to bring forth accurate representations of reality which we can learn from. Although it can be extremely unnerving, that only goes to show how well the roles were performed. It's uncomfortable because it is so real and addresses the unwanted truth that marriage is not easy. Overall, I would give this film an 8/10. If you like movies that tackle real issues, you will definitely appreciate this film. You may find yourself uneasy at times, but in the end, you’ll be amazed by such a realistic performance. See more Read all reviews
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW
Days of Wine and Roses 100% 89% Days of Wine and Roses Watchlist Cool Hand Luke 100% 95% Cool Hand Luke Watchlist East of Eden 86% 90% East of Eden Watchlist America, America 67% 85% America, America Watchlist A Streetcar Named Desire 97% 89% A Streetcar Named Desire Watchlist Discover more movies and TV shows. View More

Movie Info

Synopsis History professor George (Richard Burton) and his boozy wife, Martha (Elizabeth Taylor), return late one Saturday night from a cocktail party at the home of the college president, Martha's father. Martha announces that she invited another couple, newly appointed instructor Nick (George Segal) and his timid wife, Honey (Sandy Dennis), over for a nightcap. When the younger couple arrive, the night erupts into a no-holds-barred torrent of marital angst and verbal tirades.
Director
Mike Nichols
Producer
Ernest Lehman
Screenwriter
Edward Albee, Ernest Lehman
Distributor
Warner Bros., Warner Home Vídeo
Production Co
Warner Brothers
Genre
Drama
Original Language
English
Release Date (Theaters)
Jun 22, 1966, Wide
Release Date (Streaming)
May 1, 2008
Runtime
2h 9m
Sound Mix
Mono
Most Popular at Home Now