Rebecca

Audience Reviews

View More (1000+)

Glafira Regina O An unnamed young artist, serving as a companion to an eccentric lady vacationing in Monte Carlo, meets wealthy widower Maxim de Winter, whose wife died about a year earlier. Maxim can be brusque and prone to flashes of anger, yet he draws her in. Eventually, they marry, and she moves into his ancestral estate, Manderley. But the oppressive atmosphere of the unfamiliar surroundings—and the lingering, invisible presence of her predecessor Rebecca—begin to weigh heavily on her. Everyone seems to remember and miss Rebecca: the servants, Maxim’s relatives, even casual acquaintances. Beneath the façade of a happy marriage lies only loneliness in a dark mansion. It’s not a spoiler to say there are no ghosts here—Hitchcock never truly dealt in the supernatural. But they aren’t needed. Human stories of unrequited loyalty, fear, insecurity, and isolation can be far more frightening than the most menacing specters, demons, or monsters. Rebecca proves this brilliantly. The woman herself appears just once, as a portrait, yet her presence is felt everywhere: in the furtive glances of servants and guests comparing the new Mrs. de Winter to the old, in her possessions, in the accounts of an eccentric housekeeper, a simple-minded worker, and other unsettling characters who seem eerie and unnatural—evoking a kind of uncanny valley. Maxim himself grows increasingly remote and tense in the heroine’s eyes, erasing the kindness she once saw in him. Loneliness among those who subtly (or openly) reject you is truly terrifying. And it perfectly matches the rules of classic gothic fiction, which was less about supernatural horror and more about illuminating human flaws. The rest… would be spoilers. Naturally (this is Hitchcock, after all), the film is exquisitely shot and acted. Joan Fontaine is stunning as the timid, nervous heroine. Laurence Olivier is entirely convincing as the strained, broken Maxim. Judith Anderson, as the infernal and enigmatic Mrs. Danvers, gives new depth to the “eccentric housekeeper” archetype. George Sanders shines as the typical slick opportunist you might find in a noir thriller of the time. These are characters you won’t easily forget. As for the visuals… an Oscar for cinematography isn’t handed out lightly. The frames are gorgeous. Interestingly, almost all are portraits—there are very few landscapes (at least half the film unfolds inside the mansion) and few still-life shots. This is a story about people, and the cinematographer focuses entirely on them—bright, eccentric, and wildly different—and shows them beautifully. Hitchcock is a recognized master of suspense, with many masterpieces to his name. But Rebecca is a strong contender for his most psychological and atmospheric work. Psychology is a delicate craft, and few directors can convey it so powerfully—without jump scares, without action, but simply through dialogue and glances. A purely human story, yet scarier than many horror films. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 08/11/25 Full Review Tom G Not aged well and kinda boring sorry Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 07/28/25 Full Review Jeremy W. Hitch! Fest at The Egyptian Theater Rated 4.5/5 Stars •  Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars 06/21/25 Full Review Stephen C Success in 2 1/6 hours!!!!!!! Starring Lawrence Oliver!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 06/07/25 Full Review Jay W Rebecca is the only Alfred Hitchcock film to win the Oscar for Best Picture. This was Hitchcock 20 years before "Pyscho", this was far from his peak as a director in quality or popularity. Heck, Hitchcock doesn't even make a cameo in the film. Although this isn't Hitchcock's Best Picture, you can still see the potential peeking through...in the final 40 minutes. One of the main lessons Hitchcock seemed to take from this film is that he needs to get to the hook earlier in the story. The romance between Mr. and Mrs. De Winter gets dull as soon as they leave the hotel. Once the reveal of Rebecca is given, then the movie starts to get engaging again. In future Hitchcock films, he learns to get to that point a lot faster. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 05/07/25 Full Review Lars N Nice atmosphere and character work, but the movie is slower than need be, and the end falls a bit flat Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 05/23/25 Full Review Read all reviews

Rebecca

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW