Love Is a Many Splendored Thing

Audience Reviews

View All (109) audience reviews

Audience Member Corny but still good. Beautiful score and lush romance. And stop complaining that Jennifer Jones is white. The character is ‘Eurasian’ meaning half Asian and half white. So why can’t a white actress play her? It is no different than if an Asian actress played her. Done. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 01/07/22 Full Review steve d Strong performances poor script. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 03/30/23 Full Review Audience Member Considering the time the movie was made, it had a beautiful appeal with the characters. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 01/19/23 Full Review Audience Member Hollywood has an infamous history of casting white American actors to play Asians and this is one of the most notable cases as superstar Jennifer Jones took on the role of a Eurasian doctor. I am obviously against this practice as it is grossly offensive and prevents Asian actors, deserving of representation, from receiving work. With this acknowledged I have to admit that I do enjoy the performance that Jones gives, I am a massive fan of her work, and I think that she may be the only reason to watch the film. Everything else about the film, other than the cinematography, is miscalculated and that lets down a strong central performance worthy of the praise that it received. Eurasian doctor Han Suyin, Jennifer Jones, lives and works in Hong Kong in 1949 having left behind her family in China and struggles with the pain of being a widow due to the death of her first husband. Her life changes when she meets American journalist Mark Elliott, William Holden, who takes a romantic interest in her and pursues her despite her informing him of her hesitance to begin a new relationship for fear of getting hurt again. They fall in love over time even as Suyin's racist employer Humphrey Palmer-Jones, Torin Thatcher, and his wife Adeline, Isobel Elsom, try to dissuade her from getting close to him because he is legally married but officially separated from his wife. They are unable to marry because his wife will not grant him a divorce but he is accepted by her family and they move towards a more committed relationship. Suyin is fired from her job as a result of the relationship but adopts one of her patients as a daughter as Elliott heads to Korea to report on recent conflicts there. Jones is one of my favorite actresses from the classical era of Hollywood so that must be taken into account when considering the fact that I love almost every performance she has ever given. While I wouldn't put this performance on the level of her work in The Barretts of Wimpole Street (1957) and Carrie (1952) I do think that she provides her customary charm and intelligence to the role. She is working with a screenplay that gives her almost nothing to work on and yet she convinces us of her warmth as a medical professional and her discomfort in a world where she is never truly accepted. It is unfortunate that she and Holden have little chemistry, I would mostly chalk this up to his wooden performance, yet I found small pleasures in her individual work during their interactions as she is lively in every moment. Her Best Actress nomination was deserved and although she ran up against strong competition in Eleanor Parker in Interrupted Melody (1955) and Susan Hayward in I'll Cry Tomorrow (1955) she would have been a better winner than the over the top Anna Magnani in The Rose Tattoo (1955). The other selling point that the film has behind it is it's fantastic cinematography as Leon Shamroy makes full use of the location he is shooting in. Brightly colored backdrops and the accentuation of azure blue in particular help the film to stand out as viewers are sure to thrill at the sight of the couple frolicking in stunningly clear waters and looking out at a beautiful view from a perch on a hill. Sadly the screenplay is not quite as stunning as John Patrick asks Jones and Holden to state all of their emotions and their discussions don't have the natural quality that makes great romantic films work. There is also a lack of conflict in the film as three quarters of it consists of Jones and Holden going out on various dates before we learn that she will lose his job and he is suddenly shot. Racism is passingly referred to but surely it would be a bigger problem in the late 1940s and Suyin and Elliott would be more aware of it's threat. Thankfully the film is only one hour and 40 minutes so audiences aren't left with the couple for too long but the feeling that the film has no driving force behind it leaves you dispassionate about the events that play out on screen. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 02/01/23 Full Review Audience Member The best romance movie ever made! With the best movie song ever sung: the title song! And the best movie score ever composed! Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 02/26/23 Full Review Audience Member A dull affair that at least sticks the landing to some degree. Tried hard to be a progressivist vision of its time but had a few issues with casting, acting and script. And very heavy-handed in places. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 06/14/18 Full Review Read all reviews

Love Is a Many Splendored Thing

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now