Elvis D
Esta segunda producción de Roger Corman es una típica historia de monstruos de los años 50 que, aun con una historia interesante de suspenso, es lenta y densa. Solo dura 1 hora y el monstruo aparece solo media hora después y en la confrontación final. Toda la película se centra más en el misterio del monstruo y es sostenida por un buen elenco, en especial la protagonista que le da vida a la cinta. Las secuencias submarinas son buenas para la época en que fueron hechas, pero el film acaba siendo algo mediocre, en especial al usar una grabación de un pulpo real y una marioneta de apariencia diferente para hacer creer que son la misma criatura cuando al ver el film, la diferencia de ambos es muy grande. Aun así, fue solo el comienzo para que Corman terminara produciendo más películas, entre las cuales surgirían buenos clásicos de culto. Mi calificación para esta película es un 7/10.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
01/01/24
Full Review
Serge C
Roger Corman's 1st film is another 50's case of better poster than movie but hey at least the sub was interesting to see.
1/2 🍿
Rated 0.5/5 Stars •
Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars
09/06/23
Full Review
Jeffrey R
Witless and embarrassing...
Rated 0.5/5 Stars •
Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars
06/16/23
Full Review
Monsol E
A fairly competent female-lead hears about a monster, and sets out to prove it exists, and stop it from eating people, just because she's nice...she even gets a "you were right" from her man at the end...and this was the 50s.
Neat!
[Oh, the monster was fun too!]
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
02/05/23
Full Review
philip h
So when this movie starts we get the standard introduction for a watery monster flick, a live action shot of the ocean rolling and crashing against the rocks. Over said standard introduction we of course get the opening credits which lists our main players. The interesting thing was, once the credits had finished we get some narration. This narration informs us of where and how this movie was shot. I've never come across that before, it was odd to say the least, kinda took you out of the movie...for a moment.
The plot to this deep sea tale is a very basic affair, let me explain in the simplest of terms. Julie, a beautiful young woman (Anne Kimbell) goes on vacation in Mexico. Whilst there she meets young handsome marine biologist Dr. Baldwin (Dick Pinner) and they slowly fall in love. The end...nah only joking.
After Julie hears a mysterious story about the death of a diver she becomes curious and decides to do some digging. Naturally Dr. Baldwin is skeptical but because he loves her so much he goes along with the investigation. After much deliberating, various tests and chats with the locals, the duo eventually discover that there is indeed a large monster on the rampage in this sleepy Mexican coastal region.
So what is the monster you ask? Well its obviously not gonna be a shark, crab or giant eel or whatever because that's too boring. At first I thought it might be a giant octopus, which we are presented with at one point. Luckily its not that either. During the brave duos investigation they actually discover (by accident) a strange piece of gloop. Now because Dr. Baldwin is of course a scientist he knows exactly what to do, stick it under his trusty microscope. After much important scientific type spiel which I'm sure nobody would really listen too intently, they come to the conclusion its a piece of mutated amoeba. Its right at that moment that you the viewer realises that the large roaming monster is in fact a large mutated amoeba. A result of atomic testing? Actually this time I don't think so.
Yes the big beastie is actually a large, umm...octopus looking amoeba with one huge comical eye that glows. It looks more like a space alien really. The creature in question looks to be a puppet on strings against an underwater set of varying quality. The creatures large glowing eye is actually pretty cool I thought, definitely brought it to life and gave it some character. Alas it also made it look like a [i]Scooby-Doo[/i] monster from the cartoons.
Next to that you of course have a lot of stock footage of various sea creatures and a reasonable amount of underwater sequences shot with real divers. There does in fact appear to be a real sequence where a diver fights off a real shark with a knife, and the production does seem to have and utilise a real minisub. Its also worthy to note that this movie does appear to have a score that closely resembles a certain Steven Spielberg movie. Believe it or not but that famous/infamous musical tune does actually appear in this movie. Not the exact same score of course but its damn close. Hmmm I wonder Mr. Spielberg.
Other than that its all business as usual really. The Mexican locals are all your bog standard, obligatory stereotypes. Horrendous accents, the men have huge moustaches and the women are all old and covered in veils (although the director, Wyott Ordung, is actually the main stereotypical Mexican local). Dr. Baldwin and all the other scientist blokes generally act like male chauvinists, patronising Julie all the time. Julie often speaks sense, is hard working and is willing to go the extra mile to get to the bottom of the mystery. On the other hand Dr. Baldwin merely thinks this is adorable and treats her like a puppy.
Heck there's even a sequence where Dr. Baldwin serenades Julie on the rocks by the ocean in a highly cringeworthy scene that feels somewhat out of place. Not that it matters because the movie was lost way before this. The reason being its just too boring, nothing really happens...like ever! We only see some monster action right at the very end and even then its woefully brisk. We don't see any other creatures or people getting eaten, no carcasses, no tension, no thrills, just lots of talk, some romance and underwater jiggery-pokery. Yeah the giant amoeba is kinda fun to look at but there needed to be way way more of it.
Rated 1.5/5 Stars •
Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars
03/31/23
Full Review
Audience Member
Don't be fooled, because the so called "Monster from the Ocean Floor" barely appears throughout the hole movie. Although the acting is okay and the camera quality is good for a super low budget movie, but it's more shity underwater. There's a time consuming continuity of dialogues and underwater sequences and a total lac of violence. Not Recommended.
Rated 1/5 Stars •
Rated 1 out of 5 stars
02/05/23
Full Review
Read all reviews
Post a rating
>
