The Wicker Man

Audience Reviews

View More (1000+)

Jordan M first off watch this back to back with the original. and while i did find the original to be boring it at least had a storyline and decent acting. with this remake after watching this i understand completely why this remake is down there with the fog, rollerball and point break as the worst remakes ever. just horrible acting and storyline and will only be remembered by the ack the bees meme Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 08/30/25 Full Review Audience Member what did i just lay my eyeballs on for a straight hour and a half, without blinking in awe of nicholas cages mysteriously both great but also highschool drama club level of acting Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 08/15/25 Full Review thiago s Filme fraco, o roteiro é fraco, as cenas de terror são fracas, a história é fraca, o elenco é fraco, e ninguém ajuda a melhorar o filme, os personagens são fracos, e o filme deveria ter cenas bem melhores e relevantes, para fazer o filme ser bom Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 07/15/25 Full Review Shaun R Horrible film should be burned into oblivion. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 06/08/25 Full Review Josh A I watched this movie this morning while I was ill and in recovery. I quite liked it. I still am ill by the way. But, basically, the main thing you need to know is that I haven't seen the 1973 movie before but plan on seeing it and its spiritual sequel, The Wicker Tree. I just watched this one first as it was on Prime Video. It's a solid mystery story with Nicholas Cage, to be honest. Is it boring at times? Yes. But is it overall a good film? I'd say so. It's entertaining enough and kept me satisfied while I was ill, so I liked it. Also, the ending was alright, but the version I saw from the 1973 film was better. Not much else to say. I'm going to get some rest now. Good night. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 12/13/24 Full Review Kyle M The surrounding notoriety of “The Wicker Man” remade in 2006 starring Nicolas Cage effectively resurrected the story under piqued attention, which led to having the signature twist unveiled prematurely. 2006’s director Neil LaBute seemingly sought in cashing on the genre’s firmer foundations being reworked to further rust without much attributive originality to guarantee impressionable significance beyond the given reputation’s negative reception. It ideally been proven to work in going for the unfamiliar angle that supposedly modernizes how it was done previously, not for the better by the way. Robin Hardy’s directorial passion has gotten connected to the 1973 cultural take on pagan horror with an edgier grit ethically driven through an investigative narrative that’s been brewing the somewhat chills as the twists and turns been going back and forth, spiked by the decade’s stark saturation for an unsettling mixture. It unfortunately got affected by its own legacy, like most horror tales unable to separate from having an intimidating, timeless impact but rather as formulaic feats to self-destruct its fearful intentions. Though a notion been previously assured that such knowledge wouldn’t change the climatically built effect, if only it wasn’t so obvious that is, as well it doesn’t change the profound disturbance at the end. So which leaves performative deliverance in carrying the film besides its structural intelligence, exceptionally excelled by Edward Woodward and Christopher Lee with mesmerizing convictions over influential religious reliefs they had to embrace. Watching the original and remake back-and-forth easily declare a winner in the double feature when the latter’s approach showed frivolous, immature execution that visually parodies the circumstantially weighted gravity. The only provocative effect is to see the original if haven’t done so, to actually see how comparably bad and how much the remake lacks as it only replays the scenic direction in conversationally coerced matters that made the outing much lower than immediate predictability with misled “edge”. Because of that, it apparently lost the pull into welcomed slumber, contrast to the diegetic yearn. Even though there isn’t much enthusiasm towards the British film due to how disturbing it anchored, there’s no need to argue that the remake is soulless after witnessing what unfolded prior – unless star power actually becomes the appealing factor in terms of familiarity. Though with zero interest in ever seeing it nor any direct connections besides associated spirituality, Ari Aster’s “Midsommar” did, however, came to mind upon watching the traditional celebrations unfolded in the 1973 original, especially the tactics it’s characteristically used. Even without seeing it, just from a glance and narrative familiarity actually show true modernization of the story Robin Hardy directed and became one of the genre’s cherished influences to inspire effective frights. Rated 2/5 Stars •  Rated 2 out of 5 stars 11/01/24 Full Review Read all reviews

The Wicker Man

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now