Audience Member
Well what did you expect? The Godfather of horror?
Not to be confused with that other low budget horror film that was actually good, this super low budget movie is about a reporter who is doing a story about her father's soup kitchen and how it's helped the homeless and decreased unemployment rates. Whilst interviewing a homeless guy he tells her that the reason there are less and less homeless people is because a Satanic cannibal cult is killing and eating them. Of course she thinks he's just crazy, but his story is backed up by the fact that employment rates have not risen as the the unemployment rates drop and things start to get a little bit quirky when the his severed head turns up in a cardboard box with her name on it. She has to get to the bottom of this.
This is an utterly retarded movie as you probably already figured, the acting is epically bad, the characters are under developed, the film quality is cheap, the cinematography is awful, the story leads nowhere and the script is incredibly cheesy. This, so-called, horror movie generates way more laughs than it does scares, like for example a voice over telling you how horrible maimed and disheveled a murder victim was and you are prepared for the worst, but this is so low budget that all these horrific mutilations amount to a woman lying naked in a bath tub with a little bit of blood on her.
If you're expecting it to be one of those exploitation films where everyone says how much fun it was and then when you watch you are just so shocked and horrified by how off-puttingly violent it is then you've got the wrong idea. This movie is not without it's bloody and brutal moments, but these bloody and brutal moments are handled so poorly that you just end up laughing at them and it's so low budget that they can't even show blood coming out of somebody, they can't even afford to show flesh wounds on people, in fact there's a scene is which someone rips flesh off someone's face, and he literally peels what is obviously raw meat off this guy's face to reveal a patch of fake blood, hahahaha!
Another good thing about this movie is that it manages to stay free of gratuitous rape scenes, which a lot of sicko exploitation directors unfortunately like to cash in on, it does contain a scene of people ritualistically copulating in a pool of blood, but apart from that there is no sexual depravity, the annoying psycho girl doesn't even touch herself when she is killing people. I would have welcomed a little more gratuitous softcore nudity, but at least there's no rape, so bravo on that.
Overall this is a crappy movie, entertaining but complete and utter crap. I should give this much less but it I also watched Eagle Eye today and I gotta tell you this was so much more enjoyable, I give this 2 stars out of 5.
And thank you KaJe for requesting this review I'm glad you liked my story.
Rated 2/5 Stars •
Rated 2 out of 5 stars
01/16/23
Full Review
Audience Member
they tried too hard, and failed miserably.
Rated 0.5/5 Stars •
Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars
01/19/23
Full Review
Audience Member
Basically an effed up home movie, why was it available for me to rent? A good setup for a horror movie, but incredibly terrible and horribly made. To simulate chaos, the camera does not need to flip upside down, and cheesy dialogue is not creepy. Worst movie I have ever seen. Literally.
Rated 0.5/5 Stars •
Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars
02/15/23
Full Review
Audience Member
bad b-movie... do not waste your time with this one...
Rated 1/5 Stars •
Rated 1 out of 5 stars
02/03/23
Full Review
Audience Member
Lame. Somehow they succeed in making a post-2000 b-horror movie less gruesome, less graphic and less entertaining than the average b-horror movies in the 70s,80s and 90s.
The good part is Emily Haack is killed in the first three minutes of the movie
Rated 1/5 Stars •
Rated 1 out of 5 stars
02/18/23
Full Review
Read all reviews
>
