Stephen C
Success in 1 hour and 27 minutes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In both color and black and white versions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dubbed and subtitled in worldwide studios!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rated 5/5 Stars •
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
10/30/25
Full Review
SkyRo P
1959’s The Hound of the Baskervilles is a classic horror mystery that really leans into the dramatic, theatrical style of films from its era. The performances are what you’d expect from a 1950s production — eccentric, a little over-the-top, and often more theatrical than grounded. That said, it still manages to tell an engaging story, especially once you get through the slow, somewhat bumpy opening.
The gloomy atmosphere, foggy moors, and mysterious murders set the tone for a fairly entertaining detective tale. It follows Sherlock Holmes as he investigates the legend of the demonic hound haunting the Baskerville estate — and while the horror elements aren’t all that scary by today’s standards, there’s a certain charm to how it’s all presented.
Once the mystery starts picking up, the film becomes more fun. It’s got that old-school horror vibe — dark corridors, cryptic characters, and dramatic reveals. Of course, it’s not something I’d rush to rewatch, but for a film made in the 1950s, it holds up as an interesting piece of gothic storytelling.
The only real struggle was actually finding the right version to review — there are so many adaptations of The Hound of the Baskervilles that it took a bit to make sure I was watching the right one. But overall, this Hammer Films adaptation stands out as one of the more memorable takes on the Sherlock Holmes story, especially thanks to the atmospheric visuals and the presence of actors like Peter Cushing (as Holmes) and Christopher Lee (as Sir Henry).
🎬 Final Thoughts: Not groundbreaking, but a fun, eerie throwback to classic British horror. Worth a watch at least once if you’re into vintage mysteries.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
06/18/25
Full Review
Kalissa H
Peter Cushing made a phenomenal Sherlock! You could definitely tell this was a Hammer film by the look and atmosphere of it. Definitely a different story than the 1939 version. I always feel sorry for the hound, but despite that it was very enjoyable.
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
05/02/25
Full Review
Jens B
The Hammer version of the well-known material unfortunately didn't work for me. Yes, a misty moor with an old manor house is perfect for the gothic horror of Hammer Studios, the blood glows in a luscious Technicolor red and Christopher Lee is great as the last offspring of the Baskervilles. André Morrell also makes a good Dr. Watson.
Unfortunately, I find Peter Cushing's interpretation of Holmes very pale. The story is also more suited to a slow, atmospheric horror drama than a loud, colorful adventure film (for the time). And the beast really doesn't scare you.
Maybe I've seen too many interpretations of The Hound of the Baskervilles or there are simply better Holmes stories, but unfortunately this film adaptation is no more than averagely entertaining and rather dry. I liked it much better as a child.
Rated 2.5/5 Stars •
Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars
02/07/25
Full Review
Logan D
Sherlock Holmes investigates a local legend.
Cushing is perfect as Holmes and you can see why Fisher was chosen to direct so many Hammer films. It's the perfect combination of gaudy and gothic. I do wish films like this wouldn't have promoted the idea tarantulas are dangerous. I noted that Holmes disappears for a good 20 mins and I'm not sure why.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
06/20/24
Full Review
Sonny B
The Hound of the Baskervilles is one of the most famous mystery books ever written, and since it was first published in 1902 it has been adapted into film and TV over 20 times! And yet not all adaptions are made equal. The 1939 RKO film was the first version of this story I saw, and I still think it holds up. But what about the 1959 Hammer House version? I'd heard that many people think it is one of the best Sherlock Holmes films, and so I was eager to watch it. But before I explain my thoughts on the film, I will give a brief summary of the plot:
We open on a scene of drunken revelry at a gothic mansion. A man, Sir Hugo Baskerville, has kidnapped a young woman and is in the process of merrymaking with his friends; however, the woman escapes across the countryside, and an enraged Hugo pursues her despite the protests of his friends. He catches up to her in a ruined abbey and promptly murders her, which seems......unnecessary, but he soon gets his comeuppance when a demonic hound attacks and kills him.
We then learn that this story was being narrated to Sherlock Holmes by Dr Mortimer. Mortimer was a friend of Hugos descendent, Sir Charles Baskerville, and it is revealed that Charles died under similar conditions to his villainous forefather. Now, Mortimer fears that this same fate is in store for Charles' nephew, Henry, and he has come to Holmes for advice.
And so the complexity continues. But to avoid revealing too much of the plot, I will leave my summary here.
The Hound of the Baskervilles is, first and foremost, very entertaining.
The cinematography, by Jack Asher, is theatrical and exuberant, and Terence Fisher is clearly a capable director.
The acting, for the most part, is very good. Peter Cushing is brilliant as Sherlock Holmes, and his performance is energetic and forceful. André Morell fits the role of Watson perfectly, and Christopher Lee completes this strong central trio. I must also give a special mention to actor Miles Malleson as the comic relief (Bishop Frankland), for I thought he stole the show everytime he was on screen.
I also thought that the film had several plot holes stemming from changes made to the narrative of the book. I felt as though Holmes and Mortimer read too much into Sir Charles's death, and the behaviour of the antagonist was inconsistent, but it would be unfair to criticise these elements too harshly, for this is definitely a good adaption. I am not sure if it is the best version of this story put to screen, but for fans of both Hammer House studios and Sherlock Holmes this is a must watch.
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
09/19/23
Full Review
Read all reviews
Continue with Google
>
