Shioka O
Informative and engaging. History of homosexuality in Hollywood. Lots of classic films are mentioned.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
01/11/23
Full Review
Thomas M
Best documentary movie ever made!
Rated 5/5 Stars •
Rated 5 out of 5 stars
11/25/22
Full Review
Audience Member
Five things hit me harder than a hammer to the kneecap while watching eye-opening 1996 documentary "The Celluloid Closet."
(1) The movie, directed by Rob Epstein and Jeffrey Friedman, is, at its simplest, a study of homosexuality and its relation to the entertainment industry. At its most complex (and its most striking), though, is it a commentary revolving around the media's effective strategies in defining what's "normal" in terms of gender and sexuality, analyzing how the deficiency of portrayals of the LGBT community over the last century or so has essentially worsened the hopeless pangs of alienating "otherness" to have afflicted the minority group.
(2) Due to the lacking of widespread representation of the gay populace, many have been faced with the difficult task of having to rearrange the stories of heterosexually dominated films to try to find something relatable within them. For some, Joan Crawford wearing a black cowboy shirt throughout "Johnny Guitar" (1954) was enough. For others, Thelma and Louise's friendship strengthening road trip was, at its center, about same-sex love. Even the sexualized depiction of bisexuality in "Basic Instinct" (1992) still meant something if only because it was something instead of nothing. "I'd rather have negative representation than no representation," talking head Harvey Fierstein frankly admits, providing the movie with one of its most crushing quotes.
(3) As a young, white, heterosexual male - the most numbingly privileged demographic in the world - never have I had to worry about seeing someone like me reflected in the media. Never have I had to seek out entertainment catering to my sexuality or my culture: both are seen as such "normal" facets within our society that few find the time to question how much is left out in the process. For anyone who isn't categorically part of the majority has to thirstily search for anything that parallels their own lives even remotely, and that's an unfair, heartbreaking reality, an additionally brutal supplement within a globe that finds people more easily able to define their sense of self by ambushing someone who isn't like them as an "other" to be compared.
(4) Why is the image of a man showing affection toward another man seen as the visual destruction of masculinity - really a sign that a man is weak, soft - whereas the sight of a woman passionate toward another woman is looked at as something beautiful, comforting, sexy, and, perhaps, even an extension of the warmth that is female sexuality? Why is it unacceptable for a man to be feminine, while it's enthralling, sometimes even titillating, for a woman to be masculine? Why has it taken so long for there to be accurate delineation of the LGBT community when they've always existed, when they've always been so integral to the entertainment business? Why does society so oftentimes strongly fear people simply because they are not like them?
(5) In the twenty years since "The Celluloid Closet" was originally seen by mainstream audiences, things have been rapidly changing for the better, perhaps a sign that films like this one are, in fact, capable of drawing attention to the recurring crime of underrepresentation. The overarching society in which we live has a long way to go in widespread acceptance, but like all stigmas perpetuated by media and people who consume that said media, social change can spread like wildfire with enough normalization and with enough neatly packaged reminders that to ostracize another is a pointless endeavor - the celebration of all is of utmost priority, and nothing should be stopping us from running up that hill.
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
02/03/23
Full Review
Audience Member
This is a good movie, but I find it highly annoying that they do not provide simple captions on the screen, that state the name of the movie they are talking about. That would not be hard to do--without such captions it is hard to find the movie title anywhere.
Rated 2/5 Stars •
Rated 2 out of 5 stars
02/20/23
Full Review
Audience Member
The premise of the topic of homosexuality and Hollywood was very concisely articulated through the documentary style, and utilized a chronological overview that lays the ground work coherently and engagingly, with just the right particular attention to both the various stereotypes and tropes of homosexuality, censorship, and the utilization of purposeful, yet subtle, innuendo that many filmmakers throughout the years utilized in history to work around censorship.
The interviewees were a good selection of scholars, actors, and filmmakers. The Narrator, Lilly Tomlin, did a good job of narrating, expressing just the right tone and infliction for the subject matter. Despite there being a narrator, what was being said in the film did a good job of being expressed through the cinematic images being utilized, the narrator, and the interviewees such as Tony Curtis, Whoopi Goldberg, and Daniel Melnick to name a few of those whom contributed.
Overall it was an excellent basis for the topic, very engaging despite its traditional documentary format, and you can tell that a fair about of care and attention went into its production. Despite the fact that it might be a little dated by 2015's standards, it is still relevantly informative and fascinating, and is something that should still be watched even now if you are a cinema history buff or just plain love cinema.
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
02/13/23
Full Review
Audience Member
The premise of the topic of homosexuality and Hollywood was very concisely articulated through the documentary style, and utilized a chronological overview that lays the ground work coherently and engagingly, with just the right particular attention to both the various stereotypes and tropes of homosexuality, censorship, and the utilization of purposeful, yet subtle, innuendo that many filmmakers throughout the years utilized in history to work around censorship.
The interviewees were a good selection of scholars, actors, and filmmakers. The Narrator, Lilly Tomlin, did a good job of narrating, expressing just the right tone and infliction for the subject matter. Despite there being a narrator, what was being said in the film did a good job of being expressed through the cinematic images being utilized, the narrator, and the interviewees such as Tony Curtis, Whoopi Goldberg, and Daniel Melnick to name a few of those whom contributed.
Overall it was an excellent basis for the topic, very engaging despite its traditional documentary format, and you can tell that a fair about of care and attention went into its production. Despite the fact that it might be a little dated by 2015's standards, it is still relevantly informative and fascinating, and is something that should still be watched even now if you are a cinema history buff or just plain love cinema.
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
02/14/23
Full Review
Read all reviews
Post a rating
>
