Infected

Audience Reviews

View All (22) audience reviews

Audience Member Infection z 18.1.21 I understand it was going back and forward timewise but it didnt do it well, it felt fragmented. Some of the acting was flat. Music didnt always work well. It felt like a joke .. was it? Did wonder if the openning first scenes could have stood for the whole film. That guy had some pecks. Continuity issues. It was all-white. Ain't there no 'people of colour' in the area?! Act-tough (a touch) misogynistic. Felt like the concepts got glossed over or just talked about. Thought Loretta-Lou was going to be plastic, just like the lady in pink. Why does Mr Madsen make me think of Mr O'Rourke? Oh, come on, how are they gonna protect a compound with a two bar gate?! Just so middle. Lame. 3.4/0. Felt like reducing that score just for the last few minutes but I'm going to let it stand.D.B. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 02/24/23 Full Review Audience Member they filmed less than half a move and edited it together anyway Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 02/14/23 Full Review Audience Member This film is a mess and I'm not talking about those hoards of flesh eaters that it features. Without wishing to state the obvious, all movies are shot as a series of scenes, but even the majority of b-movies make at least an attempt to then gel those scenes together. This film does no such thing - it keeps lurching from one random scene to the next without any real explanation. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 02/24/23 Full Review darin c Rich character development if not somewhat bizarre with a virus not unlike that found in 28 Days or Weeks Later, so they really are the Infected and not zombies. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review Audience Member Rich character development if not somewhat bizarre with a virus not unlike that found in 28 Days or Weeks Later, so they really are the Infected and not zombies. Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 02/22/23 Full Review Audience Member One line summary: Terrible zombie film; two actors wasted. ----------------------- Louis and son Andrew attempt some bonding centered around deer hunting. Dr. Dennehy is the local sawbones. He's doing the same thing with his son Seth. Things start to go to hell after one of Dennehey's patients (a friend's grandmother) bites him; the wound starts getting nasty. Seth and Andrew bond over being embarrassed by their respective fathers, and over loving illegal firearms. After granny goes missing, Louis, Dennehey, Andrew, and Kelly (the granddaughter) go looking for her. The other youngsters get plowed, and Seth gets attacked by granny. Things go downhill from there. Will the authorities arrive and fix all this viral outbreak? -----Scores----- Cinematography: 5/10 Not so good. There is too much fuzzy focus and failures with zooming. Camera rotation I can always do without. Zombie effects were on the poor side. Sound: 3/10 The actors were usually miked OK, but not always. The score/incidental sound varied between irrelevant to counterproductive. Acting: 2/10 I've seen Michael Madsen give wonderful performances in several movies, but this was not one of them. William Forsythe was a bit better (accounting for the two points). The lesser players were just horrible. Tracey Sheldon was pneumatic and decorative, but did not deliver lines well. Screenplay: 0/10 Talking zombies? Thinking zombies? A zombie who wins an argument with a normal healthy human being? Zombies having telephone calls about uncashed checks and child custody? --- Horrible dialog. Little internal logic. A new Lyme disease that accounts for zombie behaviour? I doubt it. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 01/13/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Infected

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now