Origin: Spirits of the Past

Audience Reviews

View All (237) audience reviews

Audience Member It's a pretty good movie, sure, but no other film has me wanting to watch it OVER and OVER and OVER like this one. There's just something so captivating about it. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 01/13/23 Full Review rory s I liked this movie. It was a good animation, with top quality animation. The story was good. Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 03/31/23 Full Review Audience Member It is an excellent movie that despite being a bit longer than it should is masterfully animated, has exceptional sound and music, and is worth seeing for its positive environmental message alone. It is no Nausicaä, but it is a wonderful effort that is most definitely worth watching. Rated 4/5 Stars •  Rated 4 out of 5 stars 02/04/23 Full Review Audience Member I thought Origin: Spirits of the Past was a pretty enjoyable Anime film. As far as environmental Anime features go, it's definitely not as strong as Hayao Miyazaki's Nausicaa and Mononoke, but with some creative visuals, nice music, good chemistry between the two leads, cool scenes with Agito showing his forest powers and an awesome opening sequence, I definitely recommend this one. Rated 4/5 Stars •  Rated 4 out of 5 stars 02/02/23 Full Review Audience Member This movie has some remarkable backgrounds. The story and characters are about as cliched as possible. I was just sitting in front of the screen predicting every turn without even thinking. Shame. Rated 1.5/5 Stars •  Rated 1.5 out of 5 stars 02/26/23 Full Review Audience Member This has the "Avatar Syndrome" in having first rate production values but none of the story and soul to truly engage with the audience. First impression is that the film's co-existence message is almost a direct copy of Hayao Miyazaki's Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind, and the similarities end there - where Miyazaki delivered a gut-wrenching experience of monumental wonder, sadness, fragility and ferocious anger, Origin achieved none of that even with better animation techniques. The film begins on a strong footing with lush animations of two carefree protagonists parkouring across the post-apocalyptic landscape, and this is the only time the film utilised its rich setting to its fullest potential, the decaying landscape bought to life by the running youths' unbridled energy. This view is contrasted by that of the female protagonist, a girl who awakens horrified and uncomfortable with the alien land she witnesses. A lot of potential could be had by exploring the conflicting views between them, as an analogy of our present relationship with technology and the environment. But the film goes down the hill of clichés of trying to establish clear right & wrongs - technology here being wrong and the environment right. It would make sense if the apocalypse was bought about by the technologies of war, but it wasn't - it was bought about by the genetically modified plants, who were the initial aggressors. I found myself sympathising with the lost advanced civilisation as opposed to the primitive post-apocalyptic world, which the film insists I root for. And there's the characters themselves who are far from likeable - the main male protagonist appears almost infantile and naive in his devotion to the trees, which we established were the original aggressors. The trees, or nature, is here portrayed as militaristic and manipulative as the human military, in fact the humans had a stronger argument for recouping civilisation that was lost to them. The female protagonist abruptly changes her mind at the climax for no apparent reason whatsoever - if she stopped destroying the trees out of compassion for the human dwellers, the film failed to establish chemistry between the girl and what is essentially an alien hostile world to her. Lastly the male protagonist's voice acting is usually flat, cardboard-like, with little emotion to the loss of his father, and especially so after being "powered up" by the trees acting as their servant. His out-of-nowhere outbursts of violence does nothing but further illustrate the trees as the oppressing antagonists. Overall great animation, as in the craft, that unfortunately lends to a shoddy script that throws fragmented cliché plot twists that neither contributes to a strong narrative, nor use its copious slow moments to flesh out characters and establish a coherent reason for their actions. So in a sense the film is like the boy controlled by the forest - no reason for doing what he does except that he had to do it, without much thought given in at all. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 02/19/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Origin: Spirits of the Past

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW