Waterworld

Audience Reviews

View More (1000+)

Daniel Mederich It’s a Mad Max on water lol. Anyway, kind of interesting to see the large sets due to the time of when this was created. The story seemed simple yet it will be when it’s Mad Max on water. Side note, it’s intriguing to see this and recall newer films in how some ideas are slightly similar. Possibly flattery there or merely there are only so many ways to think about some ideas. For instance now, I get some of the waterworld references critics made of Avatar The Way of Water. Nonetheless, Avatar is a much better film and world built. Rated 2.5/5 Stars •  Rated 2.5 out of 5 stars 11/11/25 Full Review thiago s Filme fraco, o roteiro é fraco, as cenas são fracas, a história é fraca, o elenco é fraco, e ninguém ajuda a melhorar o filme, os personagens são fracos, e o filme deveria ter cenas bem melhores e relevantes, para fazer o filme ser bom Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 11/08/25 Full Review Troy R Old school action movie with the typical comedically evil antagonist and his crew of goofs. Run time is a bit long but ultimately it has an interesting world and a good story. Like the water version of mad max. Acting is ok, think a lot of people lowered their ratings because of how annoying the little girl is, but I mean its tolerable. Can't wait for the 30 year later sequel :P. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 10/29/25 Full Review Romas M Greetings from Lithuania. I always liked "Waterworld" (1995), despite of its cult classic status of one of the most unsuccessful movies ever. You have to give a credit to those who envisioned and created this movie simply for the concept - how many movies have ever been made completely in the sea (which you can literally feel in every scene) and with this budget, which was the biggest at the time? How many movies have sets THIS good? Sure, "Waterworld" has some flaws (who doesn't?), and the biggest of them for me was always the main villain. As good as Dennis Hopper is, he was misused in this movie, and he doesn't even hint at being sinister - he is just way, WAY over the top in every scene, and most of his lines felt flat. And that's the only weak point in this amazingly looking action flick. Overall, "Waterworld" is a superb action, adventure sci-fi flick set in absolutely unique place (even to this day). It has amazing production values, great action scenes, super cool Kevin Costner and a great MacGuffin (a way of setting a story). Still, a great flick. But i’m referring here to the so called “Ulysses Cut”. It is nearly 3 hours long - a 40 min longer than a way poorer theatrical cut. It adds depth to characters, their motivations, setting and world building. Theatrical cut on the other hand is not a good movie. The Ulysses Cut is the ultimate version of “Waterworld”. Rated 4/5 Stars •  Rated 4 out of 5 stars 08/28/25 Full Review Kashgar A I’m a fan. Sure it’s dated and it has shortcomings. But it was fun to watch then and it’s fun to watch now. Modern filmmakers might take a leaf out of Waterworld's book and remember that what an audience wants is entertainment Rated 4/5 Stars •  Rated 4 out of 5 stars 08/27/25 Full Review Joseph L If only Costner was near as good as he thinks he is. Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 08/10/25 Full Review Read all reviews

Waterworld

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now