Yes, Giorgio

Audience Reviews

View All (12) audience reviews

Audience Member MGM announced they had signed a deal with Lucio Pavarotti to star in this movie and he responded by saying, "I have done a lot of television and think I have the experience to do a movie. I will put myself in the hands of those making this but hopefully my sense of humor will come through." Producer Peter Fetterman said, "I just knew that someone had to make a movie with Pavarotti. He's got so much charisma. A talent like his appears only once in every generation." Executive producer Herbert Breslin chimed in with, "We're not going to skimp on it. We'll spend whatever it takes to make a movie right for Mr. Pavarotti." The result? $2.3 million back on a $19 million budget, but based on this Newsweek article, the estimated loss was $45.9 million. Pretty steep for a movie made because Gladys Begelman, wife of David Begelman, the COO and president of MGM at that time, was an opera lover. But it was Pavarotti's debut in the movies! He plays world-famous Italian tenor opera singer Giorgio Fini — hmm, a stretch — who has mental issues preventing him from singing at the Met. That's when his business manager Henry Pollack (Eddie Albert, I'm so sorry) introduces him to throat specialist Pamela Taylor (Kathryn Harrold from The Sender) who he refuses to see because why could a woman be a doctor? It gets better. Or worse. Because the entire movie is him pursuing her, even though he has a wife and kids, and tells her it will mean nothing and yet, she falls for this sexist man with talent and still gets hurt, but it's a comedy. Franklin J. Schaffner made Planet of the Apes, Patton and The Boys from Brazil. He deserved better. Or maybe he deserves the blame because this movie is pure pain. Or perhaps it's the script by Norman Steinberg, who also wrote Blazing Saddles, Johnny Dangerously and Wise Guys. Or could it be Anne Piper, who wrote the book this was based on? Nah, I think we know who was at fault. Pavarotti refused to work more than 12 hours a day and would do no work after 8PM. He would only be filmed in angles that made him look smaller, just one of the many demands that led the crew to call the movie No, Luciano. This movie starts with "This story is dedicated to lovers everywhere." I hate you, lovers. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 02/06/23 Full Review Audience Member Pavarotti's charm is adorable! Rated 5/5 Stars •  Rated 5 out of 5 stars 01/20/23 Full Review Audience Member Just say no to yes georgio Rated 1/5 Stars •  Rated 1 out of 5 stars 02/24/23 Full Review Audience Member Yes, I watched the re-cut sans-songs version of this vain and vile muck, the edit without music just so I could sooner listen to the recent How Did This Get Made podcast about it. No, the shorter cut was no better, no easier to stomach, still too bloated with divo-worship. This is an operatic plot without the operatic music, without the breathable air of original arias-a stifling drag, in other words. Rated 0.5/5 Stars •  Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 01/30/23 Full Review Audience Member Pavarotti's singing was magnificent here, but I blame the casting of Eddie Albert (Green Acres?) and Kathyrn Harrold for the unfortunate lack of success of this film, and the negative critical reaction to it. She looks and acts like an amateur, and there is ZERO chemistry between she and Luciano! Combined with an uneven script and an unnecessary example of the acceptance of adultery (perhaps OK in Europe, but not the USA), not to mention the unfortunate inclusion of Tony Bennett's signature song (opera singers should by and large avoid singing American standards--I mean, "I left my heart in San Fran Seesko....where leetle cable cars?"....PLEASE)! Also, the scene with the Chinese chef couple is almost as offensive as Mickey Rooney's work in "Breakfast at Tiffany's". Too bad, as much of the film is absolutely charming, and the song "If We Were In Love" (along with the magnificent scene of air ballooning over the Northern California vineyards) is quite lovely. I recommend the film even with these flaws and I am so grateful it was made. The climatic scene of Turandot is magical and we have all his opera singing and Italian songs forever because it was!? Rated 3/5 Stars •  Rated 3 out of 5 stars 01/14/23 Full Review Audience Member come on, get real. the sole purpose of this film was to showcase pavarotti's electrifying voice. that given, no one who saw it was shortchanged. Rated 3.5/5 Stars •  Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 01/16/23 Full Review Read all reviews

Yes, Giorgio

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW

Most Popular at Home Now