Mark A
Bette Davis at her peak being directed by William Wyler. Perfection.
Rated 4.5/5 Stars •
Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars
12/16/22
Full Review
Luca D
Great supporting cast. Great setting. Not too romantic more dramatic. I would say a must see.
Rated 4/5 Stars •
Rated 4 out of 5 stars
10/23/22
Full Review
Audience Member
A crappy Gone with the Wind, however Davis steals the show. I also appreciated the history lesson on Yellow Fever in Louisiana and I'm scared it might come back someday (still active in South America and Africa). It was interesting to see the obvious disgusting suppression of blacks and women in the South, while still seeing the charm of their traditions and "customs" as they call in regards to things like gentlemen behavior and hospitality. The south is both "beautiful and strange" as they say in this film. I don't know if any other film quite personifies the south as well in character, although the slavery and oppression of females is so white-washed in this film. The film makes the heroine seem as though she's the villain when she really is the hero in some aspects (breaking societal norms). If they wouldn't have made the heroine or black characters so cheap, this would've been a great film up there with GWTW. However, Davis performance is one for the decades and the film's drama, costumes and scenery, and history is worth a watch.
Rated 3.5/5 Stars •
Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars
01/15/23
Full Review
Audience Member
After winning the Oscar for best actress in 1936 for `Dangerous', Bette Davis began to complain that Warner Brothers was not giving her scripts that were worthy of her talent. In 1936, Warner suspended her without pay for turning down a role. She then went to England, in violation of her contract, with the intention of starring in a movie without Warner Brothers' approval. The studio stopped her, telling her that if she didn't work for them she wouldn't work anywhere. In defiance, she sued to break her contract. Although she lost the lawsuit, Warner Brothers began to take her more seriously and even paid her legal expenses. The part in `Jezebel' was thought to be an olive leaf offered by the studio to mollify her.
About that time, Davis made it known that she wanted the lead in David O. Selznick's upcoming production of `Gone With the Wind'. She was actually considered for the role, but Warner told Selznick that they wouldn't agree to loan her out unless he also took Errol Flynn for the part of Rhett Butler. Davis refused to work with Flynn and angrily turned down the part, although Selznick did not intend to agree to Flynn regardless. Many believed that Warner Brothers purposely created an impossible deal to punish Davis for the lawsuit while making it appear they were trying to help her. It isn't clear whether `Jezebel' was offered to her before or after the negotiations for GWTW. Clearly, it didn't matter, because Bette Davis went out and gave one of the best performances of her career and won her second Oscar for best actress.
This film is GWTW without Yankees. Instead, the enemy is yellow fever. The story takes place in New Orleans in the 1850's. Although there are references to the abolitionists and the prospect of war, the entire story takes place prewar. This story focuses on the southern lifestyle of the period, and in this way it is very similar to its more famous counterpart. It also follows the life and times of one very spirited woman named Julie Marsden (Bette Davis), who could have been Scarlet O'Hara's soul mate.
Julie shocks New Orleans society when she insolently comes to a ball wearing a red dress when it is the custom for all proper southern girls to wear white. (A production note of interest: The famous `red' dress was actually black satin, which was used because red didn't produce enough contrast in the black and white film, causing it not to stand out enough.) As a result, her beau Preston Dillard (a youthful Henry Fonda) is mortified and he breaks off their engagement. Included in the story are a couple of duels over points of honor, a stark depiction of the yellow fever epidemic, and the noble resurrection of a contrite Julie Marsden upon Preston's return.
As always, director William Wyler (with whom Bette Davis was romantically linked) does a fantastic job at direction, giving the film a genuine southern flavor and period feel. The black and white cinematography in this film is tremendous and procured the film one of its five Oscar nominations.
The acting is superb all around. This is certainly one of Bette Davis' best and most memorable performances and it helped secure her place in movie history as one of Hollywood's greatest stars. Though she never won another Oscar, she went on to be nominated eight more times with five straight nominations between 1939 and 1943. Ironically, in 1940 she lost to Vivien Leigh, who won in the role Davis turned down.
Fay Bainter is marvelous as Aunt Belle Bogardus garnering a best supporting actress Oscar. Henry Fonda shows a hint of his future greatness in a fabulous portrayal of Julie's no-nonsense beau. George Brent (with whom Davis also was rumored to have had an affair) also turns in a strong performance as Buck, the honorable gentleman who duels his best friend to defend Julie's honor.
This is a wonderful film with great acting and directing. Though not the epic that GWTW became, it contains certain elements that Selznick undoubtedly incorporated at Tara, since the similarities between the films are striking at times. I rated this film a 10/10. For anyone interested in seeing why Bette Davis is considered one of the great actresses of the Studio era, this film is a must.
Rated 4.5/5 Stars •
Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars
02/08/23
Full Review
Audience Member
I love William Wyler; he directed my favorite movie, "Roman Holiday" so I was certain that I would like this one. Unfortunately I didn't like it much at all. I hated Bette Davis' character and until I read the synopsis on Wikipedia, I found the plot a little hard to follow. Bette Davis and Henry Fonda made an interesting couple. I may watch this again but not anytime soon.
Rated 2/5 Stars •
Rated 2 out of 5 stars
02/01/23
Full Review
William L
Chock full of plantations, puffy dresses, and passive-aggressiveness, Jezebel is essentially Gone With the Wind if you took away the sweeping cinematography and the vivid colors, and if instead of incorporating near-starvation and the burning of Atlanta as some of your protagonist's challenges, you substituted the fallout from wearing the wrong color dress to the ball. The plot is dull, with the sort of romantic machinations of a slightly more contemporary Jane Austen novel, so much so that there had to be a surprise bout of the yellow fever just to shake things up a bit towards the end. The thing is though, Bette Davis was a really good actress, and no matter how melodramatic the plot, she can make any film seem solid; her character is something of a rebellious outcast (without really pushing boundaries too far), and her lack of redemptiveness was one of the most compelling aspects of the film (right up until the end, where she becomes saintly for some reason; love, I guess). Davis' transformation from uncaring brat to professional narcissist to the displeasure of virtually all those around her is interesting and well-executed, she's no typical Southern belle. The set design is actually pretty great, with crowded New Orleans street scenes, sumptuous bars, and sweeping estates all brought out in sumptuous detail. As a historical epic, Jezebel seems lacking, with more of a lean towards potboiler historical romance, but Davis (supported with Wyler's direction, particularly visual composition) makes this into something far more palatable. (3/5)
Rated 3/5 Stars •
Rated 3 out of 5 stars
04/09/21
Full Review
Read all reviews
Post a rating
>
